• SwingingTheLamp
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    20 days ago

    Apple’s skeuomorphic phase overlapped the Retina display era, though, so I don’t buy that explanation. Also, it’s nothing to do with raster vs. vector. The photos that we take with phone cameras are raster graphics, for example. They look great, and it’s because they’re high-resolution. High-res raster UI elements would look great, except then the versatile manipulation by CSS would not be possible. Vector graphics are very good at that.

    But here’s the thing: Complex vector graphics exist, too. There were some pretty fancy PostScript graphics even back in the early 1990’s. With all the pixels that we have now, we could have good design instead of flat, if the developers bothered. But it seems we’ve internalized the feeling that we’re not worth the effort, aesthetics and color aren’t interesting, and life is a joyless slog. Which sounds and awful lot like clinical depression…

    (Incidentally, odd that emoji aren’t flat design.)

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      19 days ago

      (Incidentally, odd that emoji aren’t flat design.)

      That actually depends on browser, app or OS that’s doing the render. Apple and Whatsapp use the same design, Android uses a slightly different one, Discord and Microsoft both use flat designs, but for Win11 it’s a different set

      • SwingingTheLamp
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 days ago

        Interesting! I see what you mean, but while looking up Win11 emoji, I found this article from Microsoft about adding 3D design elements based on customer feedback. And, indeed, on my work computer (23H2), they’re not-quite-flat anymore.