That’s a very silly take imo, I’ve watched some movies 20 or more times, and if I go watch a movie from a book I would like to see the story from that bloody book.
So you are saying I don’t even know the real thing, now I’m really pissed off. My point is if uou want to tell a different story, give it a different name.
The one I saw get brought up a lot was the Arthur/Trillian romance. He had actually experimented with that in drafts for other versions, too, but the movie was the first time it got all the way to the final product.
People were mad it didn’t follow the book when Adam’s was very insistent all versions of Hitchhiker’s should be different.
Yeah. The radio play, books, TV series, and film were all different.
isn’t he the one who flat out said its boring to just tell the same story again?
That’s a very silly take imo, I’ve watched some movies 20 or more times, and if I go watch a movie from a book I would like to see the story from that bloody book.
Then complain that the book was a departure from the radio play he based the book on lol
So you are saying I don’t even know the real thing, now I’m really pissed off. My point is if uou want to tell a different story, give it a different name.
He even wrote most of the movie. Including the bits that really pissed off book fans.
I know it went through a lot of rewrites after he died but i never really heard what of his survived. what was his that pissed people off the most?
The one I saw get brought up a lot was the Arthur/Trillian romance. He had actually experimented with that in drafts for other versions, too, but the movie was the first time it got all the way to the final product.
aaaaaaaaaah yeah. that definitely pissed people off.
I was mad that they removed all the good jokes