DL :)@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.ml · 1 year agoSarah Silverman Sues Maker Of ChatGPT For Copyright Infringementwww.huffpost.comexternal-linkmessage-square180fedilinkarrow-up1444arrow-down125cross-posted to: joeroganexperience@lemmy.worldaicopyright@lemm.ee
arrow-up1419arrow-down1external-linkSarah Silverman Sues Maker Of ChatGPT For Copyright Infringementwww.huffpost.comDL :)@lemmy.ml to Technology@lemmy.ml · 1 year agomessage-square180fedilinkcross-posted to: joeroganexperience@lemmy.worldaicopyright@lemm.ee
minus-squareTosti@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up22·1 year agoWould be interesting if the models where indeed trained on works that where not obtained legally. Also most works contain a notice that it cannot be reproduced without consent, and storing its content in your database seems reproduction. What an interesting time this will be for lawyers, not to mention licerative.
minus-squareSparky678348@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down4·1 year agoI know this is kind of a silly argument but storing protected work in our own human memories to recall later is certainly not reproduction. I don’t think it’s reproduction for chat GPT to file away that information to call on it later. It’s just better at it than we are.
Would be interesting if the models where indeed trained on works that where not obtained legally.
Also most works contain a notice that it cannot be reproduced without consent, and storing its content in your database seems reproduction.
What an interesting time this will be for lawyers, not to mention licerative.
I know this is kind of a silly argument but storing protected work in our own human memories to recall later is certainly not reproduction.
I don’t think it’s reproduction for chat GPT to file away that information to call on it later. It’s just better at it than we are.