On the second day of the former presidentā€™s New York criminal trial, the defense argued against seating jurors who had posted negatively about him online

Donald Trump, a man renowned for craving adulation and approval, has this week been confronted with the disdain of Manhattanites called as prospective jurors in hisĀ New York criminal trialĀ for allegedly falsifying business records to cover up a hush-money payment to porn starĀ Stormy Daniels. No wonder heā€™s apparently trying toĀ sleep throughĀ the proceedings.

While no jurors were selected on Monday ā€” with dozens excused after indicating they could not be fair and impartial in weighing the 34 felony charges against Trump ā€”Ā sevenĀ made the cut on Tuesday. (The court will need 18 people to qualify in all: 12 jurors and six alternates.) However, more were dismissed after questions arose about content they had shared on social media that disparaged the former president, and Trump himself was not spared from hearing what they had posted.

One potential juror ruled out on Tuesday was a man who recently shared anĀ AI-generated video of Trump saying ā€œIā€™m dumb as fuck,ā€ according to reporterĀ Josh KovenskyĀ ofĀ Talking Points Memo. The man had evidently tried to conceal his opinion of Trump during earlier questioning, perĀ The New York Times, and protested that the video was only something he ā€œreposted,ā€ but Judge Juan Merchan dismissed him.

ā€¦

  • grue@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    Ā·
    7 months ago

    The notion that Trump might walk for his dozens of crimes because the sheer breadth of his infamy precludes a fair trial is some perverse irony.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      Ā·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Not really how it works. The defense and prosecution do have an unlimited number of challenges to jurors who admit they canā€™t be impartial or can be proven to have such bias. They have a set number of challenges they donā€™t need to justify.

      Even if you run out of jurors, the mistrial doesnā€™t trigger double jeopardy.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        Ā·
        7 months ago

        No it wonā€™t indeed. It will just further delay the trial which is exactly what Trump wants. He either becomes president, maybe heā€™ll die, but as long as he can push this ahead of him, heā€™ll be fine