• BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Because it’s easier to use the version that’s in the distro, and why do I need an extra set of libraries filling up my disk.

      I see flatpack as a last resort, where I trade disk space for convenience, because you end up with a whole OS worth of flatpack dependencies (10+ GB) on your disk after a few upgrade cycles.

      • TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I mean it’s 2024. I regularly download archives that are several tens or even over 100 GB and then completely forget they’re sitting on my drive, because I don’t notice it when the drive is 4TB. Last time I cared about 10GB here and there was in the late-2000s.

        • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Yep that’s all well and good, but what flatpack doesn’t do automatically is clean up unused libs/dependencies, over time you end up with several versions of the same libs. When the apps are upgraded they get the latest version of their dependency and leave the old behind.

        • azenyr@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          5 months ago

          I don’t know what dependencies he has but my 3 year old system that is constantly being updated is full of flatpaks and all of the dependencies combined are only around 3GB. People see 1GB of dependencies and lose their mind.