The New Jersey Supreme Court ruled in favor of a Catholic school that terminated a teacher for having premarital sex, according to court documents.

  • BrainisfineIthink@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I agree and I’m not saying it makes sense to rationale people but objectively in this case, the optics hold water. This is a fundamentalist Catholic school with nuns. The teacher was unmarried and was also pregnant. The optics of an unwed pregnant teacher, teaching kids whose parents put them in a Fundy school where pre-marital sex is an explicit no-no does put the staff in a very awkward position.

    • buckykat@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The awkward position of their evil patriarchial cannibal death cult beliefs being exposed?

      Papists shouldn’t be allowed to run schools. No religion should.

      • themeatbridge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yes.

        And while I agree with the idea that churches shouldn’t run schools, they do and have done for a long time, and as long as people keep sending their kids there, they will continue.

      • BrainisfineIthink@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        As I said, I agree completely. But the teacher was hired into that environment and knowingly signed a puritanesque ethics clause and broke it. That’s why the case was upheld ultimately.

        • rambaroo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So what? Just because you put something down in a piece of paper doesn’t mean it should be legal.