To be clear, because reading it again gave me some unclarity, I absolutely defend Stalin because he was good, not just as a rhetorical strategy. Just that even if he could’ve been better, he was the best possible and denigrating him denigrates socialism every time. Real critique is fine (“75% good of course”) but painting him as a problem as a person cannot be removed form socialism. Hamas is doing decolonization, and denigrating them is denigrating decolonization
You know Hamas wants to kill the Communists too right? They write about it. East and West and all their respective societies and political structures are entirely aligned in their eyes.
You should read what they actually write about. If I told you David Duke wrote it you’d absolutely believe it.
To be clear, because reading it again gave me some unclarity, I absolutely defend Stalin because he was good, not just as a rhetorical strategy. Just that even if he could’ve been better, he was the best possible and denigrating him denigrates socialism every time. Real critique is fine (“75% good of course”) but painting him as a problem as a person cannot be removed form socialism. Hamas is doing decolonization, and denigrating them is denigrating decolonization
You know Hamas wants to kill the Communists too right? They write about it. East and West and all their respective societies and political structures are entirely aligned in their eyes.
You should read what they actually write about. If I told you David Duke wrote it you’d absolutely believe it.