Semantics.

  • kmartburrito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Nothing really counts anyway as I’m betting nearly all of their discussions involved crimes, which aren’t protected by attorney client privilege.

    It’s funny though, trump acting like there isn’t record of their relationship.

    • PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Minor correction: Admitting you committed a crime in the past is protected. The attorney can still tiptoe around the fact that they know you committed it, by defending you on procedural or clerical grounds. For instance, they can attack the evidence that has been submitted against you, because it was mishandled, or because the equipment used to gather it hadn’t been calibrated recently enough, or for any number of reasons. Even if they know you committed the crime, they can still ensure that your court proceedings are fair.

      Admitting that you plan on committing future crimes is not covered. The attorney can’t be party to future crimes, and admitting you plan on committing crimes makes them a co-conspirator if they don’t rat you out.