• FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    … 40’s are middle aged adults.

    “Young” is 18-19, maybe mid 20’s.

    Stop infantilizing entire generations of grown-ass adults

    • GratefullyGodless@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      This makes me think of Sen. Strom Thurmond, who when he was in his 80s it came out he had an affair when he was in his 40s, and he said it was no big deal, that it was just a “youthful indiscretion”.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Was that about when Elsie mae Williams came out as his secret daughter ? Her mom was 15 when Williams was born…

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Chill out my dude. Saying someone is young in the context of their peers isn’t “infantilizing” anyone.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        20
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        no. first. you’re wrong it is.

        You see, people past their fifties still treat me like a child… even though I’ve maintained two steady careers- simultaneously, because fuck this economy- for nearly two decades now. I am a grown-ass adult, and you do not get to dismiss, patronize or indeed infantilize me just because I happen to have a different opinion than you. that’s just being ageist.

    • GBU_28@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Infantilizing.

      Good God Lemmy, not everything is a condition/syndrome/loaded action.

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago
        1. did I say that? no. I didn’t.
        2. I know many 18 YO’s who are far more mature than a certain ex president, and at least as mature as the current one. age is an extremely poor indicator of one’s maturity, capability or the quality of their experience.
        • BB69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Who cares? It doesn’t matter that “18 years olds are on the battlefield”.

          Knife cuts both ways. I know 90 years olds more cognizant than some 20 year olds.

          I don’t want either of them leading a nation

          • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yeah? I never mentioned warfare, those were other commenters.

            The knife cuts both ways, but only one way is constitutionally sanctioned. Funny how that works.

            • BB69@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Because the majority of 35 and under don’t have the experience in life or law or professionalism to hold an elder statesman position? They can still be elected to the house of reps to earn that experience. Or hold state offices.

              • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago
                1. once again… that’s not what I’m saying. Stop putting words in my mouth. Stop running off tangents. I am saying that it’s possible to be too old in the same way that it’s possible to be too young… and that the individuals in question are not “young” at all, and acting like they’re young is a problem.
                2. majority of all Americans don’t have the qualifications you list. Should we amend the constitution to only allow lawyers to run things? Or perhaps we should just create a political caste and call it good?
                3. it’s not the amount of experience that matters. It’s the quality and relevance. When you’re sole requirement is quantity of experience, you wind up with old farts whose majority of experience predate the modern world. (More than 3/4’s of Biden’s life has been without modern social media. More than half without the WWW.)
                4. there are other qualities that also matter- like having a new idea. Biden has been part of the government for longer than I’ve been alive. Our govnernment has stagnated with people like him and Feinstein and McConnel in control. In every organization, leadership reaches a plateau where it’s difficult to grow past. You need new leadership- new ideas to leave that plateau.
                • BB69@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Professionalism-> experience in a professional environment.

                  But the fact you’ve stooped to insults tells me you have no actual argument, so that’s nice