• Arotrios@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is significant in terms of precedent - if the ruling stands, it’s dramatically less likely the argument will work in his other lawsuits.

    • funkyb@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      sorta. what is at issue here is that the actions in question are after he held the office. that isn’t a trivial difference.

      • FlowVoid@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        It goes beyond that. Some of the statements were made while in office, but the judge ruled that those particular statements weren’t protected either.