• Wilshire@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    158
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    This is dystopian.

    “We are currently exploring other methods to continue publishing our content in a way that is engaging and interesting to our followers.”

    • waratchess@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      8 months ago

      I recently watched the movie Running Man, and your quote reminded me that in the movie they have court appointed agents instead of attorneys, lol.

    • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      “We are currently exploring other methods to continue publishing our content in a way that is engaging and interesting to our followers.”

      WTF is wrong with police? W the actual F is wrong with them? I swear they think their mandate is “harm the folks we arrest as much as the law will possibly allow, both physically and emotionally.”

      What kind of person thinks this is how you treat pictures of human beings in your custody? What kind of person finds this defensible? These are human beings who may have broken some laws, but who are still human beings. Your job is to apprehend them, not to make their life worse in any other way, cops. They don’t become valid objects of your mockery in some official capacity because you arrested them.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    8 months ago

    Here I was thinking about how Lego would probably instruct police not to use their product to hide suspect identities and I was right. No family friendly product/brand wants their stuff being used by the police for obvious reasons.

    • bbuez@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      8 months ago

      Almighty rumpus in Swedish lesbian enclave

      I wasnt sure what I was going to click on, but whoever made that thumbnail deserves a gift card

  • HelixDab2@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    How about not putting them on television or in news releases in the first place? Maybe let them have privacy until they’re charged and/or convicted? How about that?

  • taanegl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    …they’re going to make a deal with Roblox now, aren’t they?

    Some poor guy, hunched over on the ground, getting brutally beaten by the cops and the cam footage shows him going “gedakadootendatendaJoe, I’ve been married a long time ago” with the default Roblox face and headbob animations.

    “Your honour, look at this footage and tell me that it isn’t hilarious. You can’t. The defence rests.”

  • Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    100
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    I understand it’s important to protect your brand identity but it’s even more sad that a toy company doesn’t understand the value of “just having a little fun”.

    Corporations really seem to exist entirely to suck the joy out of life.

    Edit: Yes, we agree that ACAB, and frankly they shouldn’t publicize enforcement information at all. This was intended to be a general statement on IP law rather than law enforcement.

    • Ech@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      43
      ·
      8 months ago

      This was intended to be a general statement on IP law rather than law enforcement.

      This is exactly the kind of shit IP law should be used for. It’s one thing when Disney goes after murals at kindergartens. It’s another thing entirely when something like a police force publicly associates your IP with their actions.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        17
        ·
        8 months ago

        I feel like it shouldn’t be IP law that stops this, but rather human rights laws. Those aren’t robust enough in the United States yet. Obviously the company will use what tools are available to them.

        • T156@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          This isn’t a human rights violation, however. Lego is not a person.

          But, Lego heads are their intellectual property, so they can stop that. The human rights part would be more of an issue for another organisation.

          • Pennomi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            8 months ago

            That’s what I’m saying, the human rights part is the only thing that matters in this issue. IP law is ultimately meaningless and a hinderance to society while privacy and human rights are a moral objection to what’s happening here.

            What LEGO did does not fix the problem, prisoners will still be used as social media posts. They do not fundamentally care about those people, they just want to protect their brand.

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Publicizing arrests is not a little fun, it stokes fear of crime in the community disproportionate to the actual rate of crime, while also shaming minorities and poor whites at the same time. It is used to get the public behind tough on crime bullshit which never targets wealthy white collar criminals.

    • McFarius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      The LEGO group has always been protective of their brand and nervous about being associated with potentially violent content, turning down a partnership with the Halo games because of that. For years, they didn’t want to make grey bricks because they were afraid kids would use them to build tanks. All this to say, this seems pretty on brand for the LEGO group.

      • grue@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        8 months ago

        For years, they didn’t want to make grey bricks because they were afraid kids would use them to build tanks.

        Which years were those? I remember the “Classic Space” sets going all the way back to the '70s had plenty of gray bricks.

        • McFarius@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          Really early on, with the original castle sets, where all the wall pieces were yellow. I believe the space sets were the first grey bricks.

    • Deceptichum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 months ago

      Haha police are so quirky and fun, I love it when they flashbang babies in cribs, shoot the dog, and murder innocent people in their homes! What wholesome fun!

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        The reason the police department is wrong is not because they’re using LEGO (trademark infringement), it’s wrong because criminals shouldn’t be reduced to “engaging social media content”.

        • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          8 months ago

          And you are right on the money. Suspects and victims shouldn’t be reduced to infotainment material. I’ve posted it meaning exactly that.