The senior officer, Amy Scott, was conducting routine duties nearby when she was directed to head to Westfield shopping centre following reports a man was using a “massive” knife to stab shoppers.

Within minutes, the officer was inside the centre and began chasing the offender.

“This all happened very, very quickly,” the deputy commissioner of police, Tony Cooke, said.

“The officer was in the near vicinity, attended on her own, was guided to the location of the offender by people who were in the centre and she took the actions that she did, saving a range of people’s lives.”

Albanese thanked the officer, other police, first responders and the “everyday people” who reacted to help victims.

    • Zozano@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      “No, but you see, since all cops are part of a systemic issue, all of them are bastards, even if they have the best intentions and aren’t complicit in the problems I have with police”

      There is probably a lot of overlap with people who think all white people are racist, or all men are rapists.

      Only a Sith deals in absolutes.

      • Bangeo@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        7 months ago

        A lot of the anti cop sentiments come from the US where cops are much worse. It seems some australians dont understand that police are trained here for much longer, training is of higher quality and they dont need to worry about the constant threat of handguns or rifles. They just read reddit and facebook and follow the yanks blindly with no critical thought whatsoever, just an angry fantasy.

        • Ilandar@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          One of the reasons why I didn’t want Lemmy to grow any more than it did. Keeping the community small but active allows people to discuss and debate without massive pile-ons occurring.

            • Ilandar@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              I haven’t had votes visible since I joined Lemmy and it has definitely been a more enjoyable experience. Whether that means it would be better without them altogether, I can’t really say.

            • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              7 months ago

              Downvotes are disabled on my instance and I think it helps a decent amount of what you’re saying. Only seeing how many others agree with someone does still lend a decent amount to the discussion I think. It’s way starker to see someone still on 1 when the person they’re arguing with is on 10 in my opinion.

              • Ilandar@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                Only seeing how many others agree with someone does still lend a decent amount to the discussion I think. It’s way starker to see someone still on 1 when the person they’re arguing with is on 10 in my opinion.

                I think this is the same problem, though. You are being influenced by how other people interpreted the comments before you’ve even read them properly yourself.

    • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Okay, I’ll bite. I think she did her job well here. I don’t think her job should exist. I guarantee, whether intentionally or not, that she has wielded her power to make a minority’s day shittier during her career, when they didn’t deserve it. Giving that sort of power to a person, giving them that control over other people, almost always leads to corruption. A few people shining through is the exception, not the rule. Victoria police ran a scare campaign in the media last year about the decriminalisation of public intoxication. How it would cause an outbreak of other crimes, and make their job harder. But no such thing has happened. Even if you don’t believe the police should stop existing, it’s undeniable that they’ve systematically lobbied for more and more powers, which disproportionately affect minorities and the poor. Reducing those powers and shrinking the force has more benefits than not doing so or allowing their power and sizes to continue to balloon.

      Edit: To be clear, the decriminalisation was directly off the back of the Royal Commission into an indigenous woman, Aunty Tanya Day’s death in custody. She was arrested for public intoxication after she fell asleep drunk on a train. Think of all the drunk footy fans you’ve seen snoozing on a train home before.

        • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          I wouldn’t feel very comfortable with a low police presence.

          Are you Indigenous Australian? A person of colour? LGBTQ? Homeless? A drug addict?

          Because from my experiences, these groups tend to feel most comfortable when there’s a lower police presence. And I think their experiences should be considered as just as important as yours.

          I’m not sure what the alternative to police would be, something like the second amendment in the US?

          You’ve got to be joking, right? Personally, I’d rather not start seeing local school shootings on the evening news. It’s hard enough hearing about the ones in the States. Let alone how much more trigger-happy their cops are due to fearing that any person they interact with may have a concealed gun on them.

          I’d go the opposite direction. Take guns off regular uniformed police. That’s how it is in London. De-escalate the threat of violence and bad people are likely to do the same. Wouldn’t you pick a bigger knife if you knew the people showing up in response would have guns?

          I think the solutions needed are social ones. Victoria built, and is building, sobering up centres. They are staffed by nurses and social workers, and have drug and alcohol counselling available as well as being able to do referrals to other services. Increasing these sorts of services and improving social safety nets and public housing all have negative effects on the crime rate.

            • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              7 months ago

              me:

              Reducing those powers and shrinking the force has more benefits than not doing so or allowing their power and sizes to continue to balloon.

              you:

              I wouldn’t feel very comfortable with a low police presence.

              me:

              Because from my experiences, these groups tend to feel most comfortable when there’s a lower police presence.

              you:

              My solution would be a much, much smaller police force

              I literally already said that but alright mate.

                • Norah - She/They@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Mate it was because you said “My solution” and then basically repeated what I had suggested 3 comments earlier as if it was your own idea. Rather than admitting on any level that I may have been right earlier. That’s not a debate, that’s just bad faith.

    • m13@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      There’s not a lot of point in an event like this when emotions are high and reactionaries are high on the “heroism”.

      But “all cops are bastards” remains true.

      In capitalist society the role of the police is to protect the private property of the ruling class and to serve their interests.

      Since their inception that has been the role of the police force in Australia, beginning with the genocide of aboriginal people in order to secure land for settlers.

      In the 80s and 90s we saw how little the role of the police force is in “protecting and serving the people” as they formed gangs to hunt down, murder, then cover up the murder of queer people.

      Can you really justify the role police play in keeping workers from striking and making meaningful change in workplace reform, or in housing where the police use violence to evict the poor in order for the rich to buy up all the houses?

      We haven’t even touched on mental health. Why in general are the police called when there’s a mental health crisis? Where are the counsellors, psychiatrists and social workers? Why was someone with schizophrenia allowed to get to the point where they became a threat to the public?

      The actions of the individual are justified in this situation. Incidentally police do some good actions sometimes by virtue of the fact that they’re currently the ones with the power, weapons, and authority to act in these circumstances.

      But there are much better ways of organising a society that don’t create such disparity, and there are much better ways of protecting communities that aren’t primarily centred on using violence against the poor to protect the greed of the rich.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    A New South Wales police inspector has been hailed as a hero after she shot dead a man who stabbed six people to death in a shopping centre in Bondi Junction.

    The senior officer, Amy Scott, was conducting routine duties nearby when she was directed to head to Westfield shopping centre following reports a man was using a “massive” knife to stab shoppers.

    Cooke said the officer was walking “quickly” behind the man to catch up with him before he turned towards her with a knife witnesses have described as “massive”.

    The NSW police commissioner, Karen Webb, also praised the inspector, calling her “enormously courageous”.

    At a press conference on Saturday evening, Webb said police believed the offender is a 40-year-old man, but he was yet to formally identified.

    As is standard practice when a police officer is involved with a death, the events have been declared a critical incident and will be investigated, with oversight from the state’s Law Enforcement Conduct Commission.


    The original article contains 418 words, the summary contains 163 words. Saved 61%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • sqgl@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    A pity she wasn’t carrying a taser. Why are guns standard issue but not tasers?

    If the guy survived we might have discovered he has secretly killed others in the past.

    We also might have discovered his motive but I dunno how useful that would be.

    • Bangeo@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 months ago

      I believe in this case it wouldnt have made a difference. The officer would and should have chosen lethal force even if they had a taser. There is a greater chance of a failure with a taser vs a handgun and faced with a murderer with a machete? It would be foolish to take that chance.

      • sqgl@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        He had a machete? I suppose that can be thrown so I accept your point if true.

        How accurately does a taser need to be pointed? Can it be easily held in the officer’s weak hand while the gun is held in the dominant hand?

        • Bangeo@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          according to google tasers have around a 40% failure rate. They are fairly close range and the prongs need to actually stick into the target to neutralise them. I believe officers are taught to use two hands for firing their gun so they most likely pick a taser or pistol not both.