• Whirrun617@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Devs saying stuff like this always makes me roll my eyes. I know games have come a long way, but you say a number that hilariously large and I know, it’s going to be silly stuff like the game tracking what people are wearing or some crap and they are counting that as a variation. It’s just pretty obviously bullshit.

    • Otakat@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s even worse than that because once you see that you just know that all they did was add the ability to mix and match ending tidbits like a damn sectional sofa and let math do all the work.

      You can get to 16,000 different endings with something as small as 8 different unlockable characters that each have a unique ending.

    • Boiglenoight@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeap. 17,000 marginally different endings in meaningless ways. Probably. I don’t know. I saw the headline and rolled my eyes. I should click it.

    • CaptPretentious@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I see it more as, there’s 17k stories to be told. You’ll likely never met someone IRL that had the same experience as you. Might have had the same major ending, but the resolution to do many other stories will be different.

  • antaymonkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m sure that, while 17k may be mathematically and technically true, they’re going to be virtually indistinguishable. I’m pretty hyped for the game but I also don’t care for the obviously clickbait claim.

    • LetMeEatCake@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I agree and I suspect companions are carrying a lot of the weight for this calculation.

      Hypothetically, if there’s 10 companions with 10 individual endings each you’d get 100 endings right there. Add in 10 main endings and you get 1000, add in 4 major side quests and 4 variations each and you’re at 16,000 ending variations.

      • UlrikHD@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Since it’s variations of the combined ending, each permutation would count as unique. Meaning that 10 companions with 10 endings each would total 10.000.000.000 variations,

      • Chailles@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not entirely sure why, but I don’t think that adds up. 10 companions with 10 different endings is a total 100 endings, however there are apparently 1.7x1013 combinations if you were to pick any 10. I don’t entirely know if I did the math right there.

        So you don’t have 1000 endings from the 100 total companion endings and 10 main endings, you have 110 total endings.

        Either 17,000 is a figure from the various combinations (compare that to Fallout 3’s purptorted 300 endings) or there are 17000 total ending “slides.” The former is much more likely.

        • LetMeEatCake@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Unless I’m getting the math wrong myself, for any “pick 1” combination set like this we’re dealing with just multiplying the combination sets together. Technically we’re multiplying by the factorial of the sample size, but 1!=1.

          We’re not picking any 10 from within the subset of 100; you cannot pick both ending 1 and ending 4 from companion A and then no ending at all for companion C. I’m assuming each individual sub-ending is mutually exclusive with the rest of its sample space. That difference of assumptions is what led to your 1.7x1013 combinations.

    • Coelacanth@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s nice to know the ending will touch upon your actions thoroughly, but I suspect it will be a lot like the The Witcher 3 technically having 40-something “endings” (but really it’s just 3 major outcomes with some variations on the details).

  • taiyang@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I mean, it’s just variations of similar endings… I’d prefer what Nier Automata did with their 26 endings. Getting an ending because I backtracked, or because I fished, or because I exploded at a very inappropriate time and place… Yeah that’s my kind of multiple endings.

    • learningduck@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      But ultimately, they are just variations of game over screens or just transitions between acts. Actual endings are like 2 or 3.

      • Xanvial@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It was 5 main endings actually. Plus maybe another one related with Emil to wrap up other Nier game storyline

      • Bleeping Lobster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’ve never been made to laugh till I had tears in my eyes by a game before

        spoiler

        (following the adventure line / the narrator losing it in the cupboard)

        Not the longest, but hands down the weirdest game I’ve ever played, and well worth the money. Now, where did I leave my bucket?

  • JackbyDev@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    An ending that mentions a yes or no response to 14 things would have 16384 variations. Don’t get too excited by this big number. It could easily be just “one ending” where they mentioned the outcome of 14ish things you did.

  • shotgun_crab@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah sure… If they just kept it to a sane number like Chrono Trigger did so much time ago, it would be much better. Why are we counting permutations as “different endings”?

  • soulifix@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    And all of them are probably going to be slightly alternate from eachother, but serving no significance. Kind of like those Mortal Kombat endings where each character had a slideshow ending, but just reworded.

  • youessbee@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’ve never played any of the Baldurs Gate games, do you guys reckon I will need to have played the originals first? Cos this games sounds great!

    • Meowoem@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      The first two were amazing but long ago, in sure there will be treats for those of us who remember them but I’m sure they’ll be expecting a mostly fresh audience.

      Just know if you hear ‘go for the eyes boo’ it’s referencing a hamster.

    • inexplicablehaddock@lemmy.loungerat.io
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      From what I’ve read, while there’ll be a few nods and references you might only get if you’ve played the original games; the game can be played with no need to have played the originals.

      Also, if you do decide to pick up the original two games, keep in mind they were made back in the THAC0 days.

    • FluffyPotato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I grew up with the first Baldur’s Gate games and both are amazing but BG3 seems more of a standalone. I played the early access and I don’t see much need to play the first 2, the story is not connected.

  • Jaarsh119@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is a very dumb article. Like, I understand there’s a lot of hype for this game right now but jfc. If anyone is expecting to be able to play this game 17,000 times and expect to see something unique each ending, they’ve lost their damn mind

    • style99@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think most people realize that this means the game is going to end up being like Fallout NV, where you have a slideshow ending showing you how your choices affected the roleplaying environment, and that there are a lot of slides you’ll end up sitting through. The number seems to imply that you have a lot potential variety of impact.

  • MindlessZ@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly that’s just like 14 different choice points, none of which have to be significant. Every choice doubles the possible endings if they throw a statement about it in the ending

  • terwn43lp@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    eh I’ll go against the grain of negativity & wish this game the best. with all that they’re promising, it would be embarrassing for this game to flop

    it seems school is closed so all the teen gamers are here to complain

    • darth_helmet@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ve clocked roughly 80 hours across all the early access builds, and I’m confident that the game will do well in its niche based on what I’ve played so far. But it is a niche, and I don’t think any one game is going to change the market that much. It won’t flop, but I don’t think it’s going to make Larian the next cdpr

        • darth_helmet@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That’d be great, I’m hoping the dm tools/custom campaign situation is good and the community does cool stuff with it. I’d play the heck out of a BG3 engine version of the infinity engine games

          • utopianrevolt@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think this game is going to have a Game Master mode like DOS2 for a while, but I imagine it will be part of the inevitable Enhanced Edition.

  • LouLimes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yeah I’m really excited for this game but 17,000 different endings just sounds like “yes” and “no” bs

  • Metaright@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    While the writer wasn’t obviously talking about so many different endings, it is still an impressive number of variations, highlighting how much the choices players will make will have an impact on the story up to the very end.

    So, are we talking something like the equipment on the player during the ending cutscene? Without more details I don’t see how this figure is supposed to be impressive.

    • Chariotwheel@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Probably just some quests that get a “what happened to them”-scene in the ending.

      Like Quest 1 can have outcome A/B/C and Quest 2 has A/B

      And you already got AA, AB, BA, BB, CA, CB variations, add some more quests and you got 17k outcomes easily.

      What matters though is how many major endings there are.

  • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    So, 17k loose “if” statements defining if some single sentences will pop up during the ending scene.

    • if player has killed love interest -> And the love interest remained dead
    • if player has killed love interest AND ressurrected -> And the love interest died, but got better
    • if player has NOT killed love interest -> And the love interest never died, just as their love

    etc etc

    • Vordus@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      You don’t even need that many ‘if’ statements. If you’re stringing together a sequence of cause and effect binary decisions (as so many RPGs are wont to do), then you only need 14 of them to get over 16,000 possible combinations!