• henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    4 months ago

    Yes. And this is from someone who lives in an area where it’s seen as cool to produce as much black exhaust as possible.

      • henfredemars@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        My wife and I call them tiny pee-pee trucks.

        The guy driving the family minivan got nothing to prove, and you know his works.

  • HelloThere@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    CCS should only ever be used to draw down existing carbon, not to greenwash fossil fuels.

    And that’s ignoring the many problems of any CCS method that isn’t burying biochar under a mountain.

  • RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    Who is “we”? I’ve never ever ever seen a carbon capture and storage demonstration that was even within an order of magnitude of the cost of simply reducing emissions, or planting trees.

    CCS is a pipe dream being pushed by fossil fuel companies to justify inaction.

    We need to be acting as if it will never work. Keep funding research, because it could be a way to fast track climate recovery, but on all other roads assume it does absolutely nothing.