I hate that my first thought about my kid not having a cell phone at school is that I won’t get a call from them if someone shoots up their school and will be panicking the entire way there.
Honestly, that’s better than knowing they have a phone and not getting called.
And you’d be panicking either way
I feel the same way.
There was an article about a boarding school that gave all the students dumb phones. I wonder if that’s an option, like schools issue kids computers.
and social media
is this going to be another one of those ‘schools think they can parent outside of school hours’ overreach?
Sounds like it and the other is something that I thought schools have been doing since cell phones have been a thing…
Edit: >from using cellphones and social media platforms during the school day.
Oh nope, just in school which is fine ig
The only concern I have is that, unfortunately, we live in a country with a lot of school shootings and phones have given kids a link to the outside when that is happening.
It sounds like it’s a ban on using the phone during school, not on simply having a phone with you.
Which honestly sounds like a rule every school has pretty much had for like 20+ years.
LAUSD cited possible tactics like locked pouches, cellphone lockers or technological means and promised the policies would be “informed by best practices and by input from experts in the field, labor partners, staff, students, and parents.”
Pouches? Maybe if there’s some quick release that teachers are given. Lockers? That does nothing about the school shooter issue. They might as well be at home. The “technological means” sounds a bit Orwellian.
I lol’d at the “technological means” what are they gonna do, put up jammers? The FCC would be on their ass in no time. Metal detectors? Don’t they already have that? Bluetooth detection? The kids will just turn off Bluetooth widespread.
hahah these are already in place and in use. they already have cell blockers in many places. this is not new and the fcc knows all about it.
the ‘new’ hotness is a pico cell that allows for voice/sms but no data
Yea, no. The FCC is quite explicit on this, read for yourself:
The use of a phone jammer, GPS blocker, or other signal jamming device designed to intentionally block, jam, or interfere with authorized radio communications is a violation of federal law. There are no exemptions for use within a business, classroom, residence, or vehicle. Local law enforcement agencies do not have independent authority to use jamming equipment; in certain limited exceptions use by Federal law enforcement agencies is authorized in accordance with applicable statutes.
I’m worried it will be something like “you must install this app while on campus and you must sign this waiver to allow us to monitor your phone via the app and we will confiscate your phone if you’re caught without the app.”
parents wont go for that. as you pointed out, parents want to be able to access their kids. they are the biggest roadblocks to ‘no phones in schools’. im one of them.
I feel like school shooters are rare enough that a policy about cell phones wouldn’t need to factor them in.
There have already been 107 incidents of gunfire on school grounds since the beginning of the year, including one in Los Angeles.
29 dead, 61 injured.
https://everytownresearch.org/maps/gunfire-on-school-grounds/
There are 115,000 schools in the united states. 107 incidents halfway through the year, so 214 approximately by the end of the year, comes out to .19 percent chance of this happening at your school, but that’s only if you assume that it’s evenly distributed, which it certainly is not. I’d guess that if you are in an inner city school with the associated higher crime rates, then your risk is much higher.
But also if you look at numbers of deaths, school shootings isn’t even on the charts. Homicide deaths in general are in second place (but close to suicide deaths) at 10 out of 100,000 kids, and school shootings are a tiny fraction of that. There are 43 million adolescents (10-19) in the united states, so 29 deaths are about .7 percent of the total homicide deaths. Or put another way, your kid is 150 TIMES more likely to die from a regular homicide than from a school shooting.
But still, there is some small risk of a shooting happening and you wanting to know if your kid is safe. So I guess the question is if the tradeoff is worth it. Seems to me like that would not be a good reason not to ban cell phones. Like there might be reasons a cell phone ban is a bad idea, but that isn’t really one of them.
Right, I have mine take them to school just to help quell that ever present voice in the back of my mind
but youre not wrong. both of these issues have already been resolved by many schools by just having kids bucket their phones on the way in…
Not even buckets, when I was in school many years ago, I have very distinct memories of texting through my hoodie on a flip phone T9 to hide it from the teachers because we were under a constant “if I see it I’m taking it” threat lmao
during school days.
Literally, the first sentence. So, no. Not even the first school to ban cell phone use during the school day.
When I was in middle school I remember the campus security (I don’t think we called them “security”) had some sort of lecture on the dangers of social media (this was circa 2004). I don’t recall details but they basically said the person in charge of security was supposedly lurking on MySpace to see what we were doing. Pretty lame and did nothing for seemingly nothing reasons.
This is going to be less effective and less popular than the prohibition of cannabis.
Not exactly related, but I remember being given instructions for what to do with your cellphone during a shooting, bomb threat, etc. The plan was to at regular intervals (maybe 10 minutes?) text that you were okay to parents, and then shut off phones so the communication wasn’t flooded. Bc I’m proud to be an American!
This would be funny if it was not real
I get that it sucks to not be able to contact your kid via phone at school…
But this is a good move.
First, I’m gonna be blunt here, even in the event of a school shooting or other emergency, having vs not having a personal phone is not likely to make a difference. Teachers, Admin Staff and offices have phones. Parents can call the school, School can call parents. Staff have training, procedures and supplies for personal medical emergencies.
I grew up as cellphones were becoming a thing. I was in highschool when the Razr was the coolest thing you could have.
Pulling out a phone in class? Warning. Do it again? Confiscated till the end of the period. Recieve an actually important call? Go outside the classroom and take the call so as not to disrupt the class.
It is not like that any more.
There are many schools and classes these days where basically all the kids are using their phones basically all the time to the point that actually teaching/learning is impossible unless you want to confiscate the whole classes phones… and that does not work because often some students or most of the class will become physically violent to prevent this from happening.
Cell phone free classrooms make teaching and learning significantly easier.
They would not be taking this drastic of a step if cellphone usage by students was not seriously negatively impacting the ability to educate them.
So let me get this straight, we’re letting Republicans treat public schools like extermination camps now
Removed by mod
