• riodoro1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    190
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    tesla is not elon

    But they pay him tens on millions as a bonus for being an idiot

    Edit: yeah it’s billions. The amount of money they waste on this cocksucker is incomprehensible.

    • MuchPineapples@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      83
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Billions. They paid him the same amount of money (as a bonus!) as Bill Gates had in total when he was the worlds richest person in 2007.

    • Evkob@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Calling him a “cocksucker” is frankly insulting to people who perform the act of sucking cock. Musk is way too selfish to perform the generous and loving act that is fellatio.

    • ASeriesOfPoorChoices@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      after paying him tens of millions, they did it again a thousand more times because thousands of tens of millions is billions. tens of thousands of millions of dollars. It’s an insane amount of money.

  • AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 months ago

    They missed a trick by using paint, when a spray of salt water would have done the job at one more subtly and more permanently

    • Pennomi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      42
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Subtle wasn’t the intent here. But I do like your thought process here.

    • smb@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      while at the same time by-design cloaking it as pure bad quality could actually cause way more longterm damage than a little bit of paint.

      on the other hand the paint could also be just a marketing strategy depending on what they smoked to get new ideas

  • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    89
    arrow-down
    36
    ·
    3 months ago

    This is dumb. Sure Elon Musk is a dickhead. And sure Cybertruck is a dumb vehicle that only dickheads would want to have.

    But I’d rather the dickheads be driving a Cybertruck than some other massive vehicle that runs on fossil fuels.

    • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      55
      ·
      3 months ago

      All car companies are run by evil dickheads. Most of them just make less noise than Elon.

    • kim_harding ✅@mastodon.scot
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      @SpaceCowboy @return2ozma ~60% of Tesla’s profits come from the sale of carbon credits, which enable other massive vehicles that run on fossil fuels to be built. E-cars are not about “saving the planet” they are pure Greenwash which is saving the motor industry.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        That’s more of a problem with how carbon credits are being regulated. Sure Tesla are being assholes for doing this, but it’s a corporation, I don’t expect them to be good guys.

        But none of that changes the fact that some meathead buying a Cybertruck instead of the equivalent fossil fuel monstrosity is reducing CO2 emissions in a direct way. Spray paint the sign a Tesla corporate HQ, don’t damage a vehicle which will only have the result of someone driving a fossil fuel vehicle a little longer while the damage is being fixed.

        • uis@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          If somehow murder became not illegal, it wouldn’t make all the corpses not murderer’s problem.

        • gila@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Literally the state of California would have lower CO2 emissions today if Tesla didn’t exist.

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            You’re assuming unscrupulous companies wouldn’t find another loophole or just pay a fine for going over the limit.

            Don’t get me wrong, Tesla is shit for helping with the loophole, but it’s a degrees of bad kind of thing. Getting fossil fuel vehicles off the road does reduce carbon emissions, but Tesla was exaggerating their numbers. They should be punished for doing this, but doubling up their numbers only works if the number isn’t zero.

            But this is all getting away from the fact that damaging these vehicles has the net effect of people driving fossil fuel vehicles longer. It’s a net harm to everyone.

            • gila@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              Unscrupulous companies in this case referring to every car manufacturer, they wouldn’t have a systemic incentive to foster an EV monopoly that is anti-consumer and actively stymies the growth of the local EV sector.

      • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        No way, that is positively enormous.

        Even carbon credit companies that do their best aren’t always (are often?) not great. e.g. trees may be planted, but:

        • locals’ may have been misappropriated for the purpose
        • you might go back five years later and find all the trees were cut down

        It seems like there is some progress with that technology that… throws gravel onto beaches or something, to be broken down by waves. Really hope it’s not total BS.

    • refalo@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      Tesla is synonymous with climate destruction and if you believe otherwise demonstrates that you have grossly bought into their propaganda.

  • Graz@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Ironically making them more corrosion resistant, by doing so…

  • Wxnzxn@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 months ago

    Without justifying this really dumb act, because there’s no justifying it, […]
    How about we just don’t vandalize private property. That’s a good standpoint to build on.

    Wow, how unbased can an article get?

  • LovesTha🥧@floss.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    @return2ozma Older Tesla’s one can give the owner the benefit of the doubt that they purchased it before Elon showed his true colours. No Cybertruck owner has that defence.

    They are lucky it’s just paint.

    I’m sure paint comes off ‘stainless’ steel real easy…

  • InternetUser2012
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    76
    arrow-down
    46
    ·
    3 months ago

    Elon sucks, but vandalizing someone else’s property because of him isn’t cool.

  • TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    3 months ago

    Good. Fuck that fascist and his companies. The only sad part of this story is that they used paint and not something that would etch or scratch the stainless.

  • meseek #2982@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    “Yes Mr. Crowler we hear what you’re saying, but unfortunately spray paint voids your warranty.”

  • Dkarma@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    “It makes no sense to vandalize Tesla’s property because you dislike Elon”

    Bahhahaahha. Bet.