The Verge has independently confirmed leaked screenshots of the clause in this year’s Team Pixel agreement for the new Pixel phones, which began circulating on X and Threads last night. The agreement tells influencers they’re “expected to feature the Google Pixel device in place of any competitor mobile devices.” It also notes that “if it appears other brands are being preferred over the Pixel, we will need to cease the relationship between the brand and the creator.” The link to the form appears to have since been shut down.

When asked, Google communications manager Kayla Geier told The Verge that “#TeamPixel is a distinct program, separate from our press and creator reviews programs. The goal of #TeamPixel is to get Pixel devices into the hands of content creators, not press and tech reviewers. We missed the mark with this new language that appeared in the #TeamPixel form yesterday, and it has been removed.”

So then what is Team Pixel, exactly? Officially, it’s a program handled by PR agency 1000Heads that seeds early units to influencers and superfans to drum up interest as brand ambassadors. While Google partners with 1000Heads, it doesn’t directly run the program, and there are distinct differences with the traditional reviews program, For example, journalists and influencers in the official reviews program often get briefed and given products under embargo before or during an event. Team Pixel participants get the devices shortly after launch, but before the public — all in exchange for some coverage on social media. For smaller creators, this can be a big leg up in terms of access.

  • Chozo@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 month ago

    This is specifically for their “Team Pixel” people. Those people are specifically in an ambassador program, they’re not “free” reviewers like you’re more familiar with, as they’re employed/contracted directly by Google. This isn’t going to affect the reviewers you probably are actually following.

    • BigFig@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 month ago

      Exactly, same shit apple has done for years. This isn’t some strong arm bs it’s a contract deal they signed into

    • pop@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Do these people employed/contracted directly by Google tell their viewers they’re employed/contracted directly by Google? Then it doesn’t make a difference. does it?

      And why do you think the reviewers people are familiar with aren’t part of the program. Do you have a list?

      • Chozo@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 month ago

        Do these people employed/contracted directly by Google tell their viewers they’re employed/contracted directly by Google?

        Yes. They’re required to use #TeamPixel and #ad hashtags on their posts, because they’re considered sponsored content. I got invited to apply to the program several years back because I had a monetized YouTube channel at the time, and I remember their application form asked if I’d be okay with putting those hashtags on my social accounts.

        For what it’s worth, I didn’t actually apply, because it’s meant for content creators, which I am not. My YouTube channel was monetized basically in error, because I never actually used it, so I’m sure they would’ve denied me, anyway.

        And why do you think the reviewers people are familiar with aren’t part of the program.

        Most of the bigger reviewers aren’t part of any sort of ambassador program, just because it basically limits them to only being able to provide coverage toward that company’s product (or at the very least, forces them into being biased toward their product), without the benefits of actually being employed by that company.

        And to my understanding, Team Pixel members aren’t directly paid for it; they just get an early unit of every new device they make and are asked to “review” it within a certain timeframe of the product launch. At least, none of the forms that I saw mentioned any payment, beyond free devices.

  • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 month ago

    Unsurprising. TBH, I wouldn’t trust the judgement of a #TeamPixel member either.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 month ago

    That camera bump is way too big. The previous models looked so much better.

    • paf0@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      You’re such a rebel.

      You’re probably right about the FTC though.

    • TJA!@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 month ago

      In what way do you think it might violate that regulation? Ads are not forbidden as far as I know?

    • M500@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      As someone who has only used iPhone, can you share why you don’t like pixels?

      If I ever switched to Android a pixel would be my first choice, but mainly because I don’t want a phone with bloat.