• frickineh@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      2 months ago

      “Fun” fact, criminal justice records are often subject to different rules than other records. In CO, we have 3 days to respond, or up to 10 if the request is so large that it needs an extension. The police, on the other hand, seem to just fart around forever. FOIA has a longer response time, but I’m guessing most federal agencies don’t get the leeway cops do, so getting a ton of these malicious requests back to back is a real pain in the dick. Speaking from experience, I’m glad I’m not the one dealing with these assholes.

      • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Eh, if it’s all from one entity and all related to similar subject matters you can deny requests or roll them up. You can also start charging maximum fees in this situation.

        • frickineh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          We can’t really do that, at least not where I am. Denying a request has to be based on it being information that we genuinely can’t release to anyone, we can’t just determine we’re not releasing something because the requestor is a pain in the ass. We also can’t charge people unless it takes more than 2 hours of time per request - depending on how the requests are split up, they may not meet that time. I don’t know how FOIA fees work, so maybe it’s different, but I also doubt fees will put the very- well-funded Heritage Foundation off too much.

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It depends on how many pages and how much time it takes. The rules sound simple, amd they mostly are, but the agency calculates how long something takes. Them asking for repeat requests is like one of the few ways something can be denied.

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    2 months ago

    Among the documents they’ve sought are lists of agency personnel and messages sent by individual government workers that mention, among other things, “climate equity,” “voting” or “SOGIE,” an acronym for sexual orientation, gender identity and expression.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      2 months ago

      They’re literally trying to make a list of people to remove. And the MAGAts are blind to their hypocrisy like always.

      • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        There’s no hypocrisy. They know their arguments are for moderates not what they think. And it’s the heritage foundation, they aren’t subtle about believing that they want a list of people to kill. They just don’t like the word “fascist”