• quindraco@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    OP, you should always include the title alt-text with an xkcd comic. Like so:

    Getting the utility people to run transmission lines to Earth is expensive, but it will pay for itself in no time.

  • chtk@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I guess connecting the panels to the net is an issue for Infra?

    • Ferk@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They could send the energy wirelessly in the form of light beams, then use special panels to transform those beams of light on Earth. Let’s call them “solar panels”.

  • addie@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    That number didn’t really seem enough to me. However, the solar luminosity is about 3.8×10^26 watts and the surface area about 6.1×10^18 m2, ie. 62.3 MW / m2. 8760 hours in a year times 62300 kW equals 545 million kW/h, at twenty percent efficiency times twenty cents each is $21.8 M/a.

    The sun might seem to be really, really hot; but in fact, it is just quite hot and really, really big.

      • addie@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The corona is indeed super hot, but also quite tenuous in comparison to the rest of the sun. The photosphere is only about 5500 °C. If our solar panels were made of diamond they would have melted at 3500, but it’s not impossible to imagine a solar panel that could be positioned ‘quite’ close to the sun’s surface - would just need to be made from some quite fancy materials.