There obviously more work to be done and I love that Chicago is so far ahead of so many cities when it comes to bicycle infrastructure.

    • lntl@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Yeah and I kind of love it anyway. Since the sale, meter pricing has sky rocketed which discourages driving. Fuck cars!!

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Discouraging driving is good but when a city can’t close or repurpose roads because of a parking meter contract, it kind of sucks.

    • feduser934@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s probably why it’s so expensive. I guess it’s good to know that the loss of revenue is already baked into the cost of the project.

  • roo@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I live in small city where the exact opposite applies. The cycleways don’t extend through richer neighbourhoods. The poorer neighbourhoods are plastered with cycleways. But there’s lots of NIMBY people here.

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ok that’s great but that’s a weird reason to build bike lanes.

    • Erismi14
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago

      Chicago has a long history of segregation in the city. It’s worse than a lot of cities in the US. POC are leaving the city in droves because the city hasn’t well addressed the issues of the past. While I think wording it for pedestrian safety makes a lot of sense, this also makes sense in the context of Chicago

      • lntl@lemmy.sdf.orgOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This. Chicago is super segregated even in 2023. This may seem like a weird reason to people who haven’t spent time the Chicago, but it’s a real thing.

    • GivingEuropeASpook@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      While transit equity is valid, I would prefer if the answers to racism and inequitality was “reparations and the dismantlement of racial hierarchies.”

  • KeavesSharpi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m thinking that unless they also add a program to give low income Chicagoans bicycles, we’re going to see a crime wave. Just sayin’

    • feduser934@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 year ago

      The article says they did:

      Earlier in the pandemic, Chicago launched a program to give away 5,000 bikes to eligible Chicago residents by 2026.

      • HubertManne@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        besides that working bikes and other groups and organizations give access to affordable bikes.and of course chicago already has miles of bike lanes of all kinds to this just makes it that much better.

    • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      There are plenty of charities that can do that, if needed because really bikes are cheap on the grand scheme of transportation options. Only the government can add bike lanes, that’s what they need to focus on.

    • feduser934@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      The concept of Chicago being super dangerous is a incorrect right wing meme.

      It has half the violent crime rate of Memphis, for example. And that violence is highly concentrated in particular neighborhoods.