Article- Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez raised the possibility that Congress should consider subpoenaing Chief Justice John Roberts if he stands by his refusal to testify about ethical questions hanging over the high court.
“And so I believe that … if Chief John Roberts will not come before Congress for an investigation voluntarily, I believe that we should be considering subpoenas,” Ocasio-Cortez told CNN’s Dana Bash on “State of the Nation” on Sunday. “We should be considering investigations.”
Ocasio-Cortez repeatedly blasted the court last week as Roberts and the five other conservative justices handed major victories to the right that effectively ended affirmative action, opened the door to discrimination against LGBTQ+ Americans, and axed Biden’s current student loan forgiveness plan.
The New York Democrat took particular issue with the court’s ruling in Biden v. Nebraska, arguing that Justice Samuel Alito’s acceptance of billionaire Paul Singer financing a lavish fish trip undercut the court’s “legitimacy.” According to ProPublica, which broke the news of Alito’s Alaska fishing trip, Singer has given millions to the Manhattan Institute, a conservative think tank that has taken public positions on a number of cases pending before the court — one of those cases was Biden v. Nebraska. Alito, in an extraordinary Wall Street Journal op-ed, denied any wrongdoing or that he has discussed court business with Singer.
—Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (@AOC) June 30, 2023
“This SCOTUS’ corruption undercuts its own legitimacy by putting its rulings up for sale,” Ocasio-Cortez wrote on Twitter after the decision.
While Republicans control the House, Ocasio-Cortez pointed out that Senate Democrats are investigating the numerous reports about unreported gifts to the justices through the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee. But Roberts has thus far declined to appear before the panel.
“Testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee by the Chief Justice of the United States is exceedingly rare, as one might expect in light of the separation of powers concerns and the importance of preserving judicial independence,” Roberts wrote in April in response to Judiciary Committee Chairman Dick Durbin’s invitation.
Along with his invitation, Roberts sent along a statement about ethics that he said the eight other current justices had agreed to try to follow. But the statement reaffirmed the belief that only individual justices should decide whether or not they should recuse themselves.
They think they have life appointments of power and no accountability. Congress should subpoena them.
And Biden should pack the court.
I hope the young people vote out the Republicans before they make a Christian Nation out of America.
If Biden packs the court, the pubies will do the same, but worse, at their first opportunity. I have no good solutions, but impeach the shitheads seems like a good thing to do.
Yes, the SCROTUS is destroying democracy, but packing the court will only create more fights.
The GOP has already packed the courts, and Trump has already said he’ll nominate more SCOTUS judges if he’s elected. The fight is already here, but it’s entirely one-sided.
“packing the court” specifically refers to adding more justices because you don’t like the current ones. the last time that the court’s number of judges changed was in 1869, when it went up from eight to nine.
So, I think it’s fairly safe to say, no, the republicans have not yet packed the court. McConnell, however, has definitely played some hypocritical bullshit during Obama’s term, blocking nominations from being confirmed specifically to allow a republican nomination, and that probably needs to be fixed as well as adding more direct oversight and ethics rules. (and I mean rules- not “guidelines”)
They will already do everything they can get away with, without worrying about the other side is doing. If the courts can be packed then they will pack them regardless of what dems do.
It’s much more difficult to pack the court with federalist society wonks than competent lawyers.
“look, guys, you need to shut up about our corruption already, it’s undermining public trust!”-roberts probably
Repulicans are not playing fair. They stole an Obama pick, then laughed about it.
Packing the courts would undo this corrupt court. Many are already bought and say they are their own enforcement on the rules they make.Young people doen’t deserve to live in a Christian Nation and the courts are planning to do this, with replublicans help.
No branch of Government should be above reproach, and to have these judges not beholden to an outside agency regarding ethical behavior is antithetical to a corruption free government. This current status erodes if not completely destroys any credible authority or respect the supreme court has.
The theoretical ideal is that judges won’t be intervened by anyone. (At least that’s how it is phrased in my country). Congress thus has to select trustworthy judges, and is supposed to be able to write and block laws without going to the court. These two not being met are the problems that need to be fixed, in the classical sense. Now, if you say these are beyond fixing and the other governmental branches have to start checking the court, there’ll probably arise a huge problem of how to establish the independence of judges.
Basically they will be officially political tools.
Understandable but at this stage they are political tools and have been so for decades. It is just now blatantly obvious and if that is going to be the case we need a new system in place to correct it or to mitigate them
deleted by creator
