• yuriy@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      No it’s a cgi aged-down Wil Wheaton, and Riker barges in to tell him he’s late for his shift at navigation or whatever.

        • yuriy@lemmy.world
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Some ferangi conned him into playtesting and debugging a new holonovel under the guise of it being a prototype training course for cadets. The whole series was the b-plot of a TNG episode about the ethics of clone voting or something.

      • Corgana@startrek.websiteOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        I like it too! I would say there are literally dozens of us but you’re the first I’ve ever encountered in the wild.

  • EdibleFriend@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 months ago

    I’m sorry but… I’m particularly offended by you pointing out numbers here. 50 years? Fuck you. Just… fuck you.

    • USSBurritoTruck@startrek.websiteM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      TNG aired in 1987, so it’s only 37 years. Whomever it was that wrote that headline stretched a bit to generate some extra clicks. Yeah, TAS ended in 1974, but there’s still 13 years in between where there was no Star Trek, which is apparently getting lumped into the Star-Trek-that-Riker-has-shown-up-in bundle.

      • criitz@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 months ago

        I mean, that’s technically correct then. The last time there was a Trek Show without Frakes was 1974 (50 years ago)

        • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Phrased differently, “it has been 50 years since a Star Trek show ended without a Jonathan Frakes appearance.”

        • Snoopey@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          The last year there was a star trek show without frakes was the year before tng was released…

          • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Technically the were no trek shows between TOS and TNG, so technically the last trek show without Frakes would be when TOS ended.

            It’s technically correct as long as reruns don’t count, and you exclude movies, etc… Hence “show”.

            It’s all riding a line of being technically correct.

  • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Meh. Looking forward to this show dying and making way for the good, new Trek shows, like LD, SNW, and Picard’s Season 3 (sorta).

    So tired of Michael Burnham and her stupid “Magical Burnham Problem Solving Mary-su Solution Express”. Really too bad, because Saru, Tilly, Georgiuo, Staments, Adira, and basically all of the other characters are REALLY interesting in this show. Unfortunately, they didn’t relegate Burnham’s character for being a “get out of writer’s block free card” to the background and that basically doomed it.

    • FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Prodigy too, first season was fantastic.

      You’ve described precisely how I feel about Disco, Trek is supposed to be about the whole team solving problems but somehow in any century…the destiny of the universe is all about her. Remove deus ex Burnham from the show and it could be so much better. Saru, Stamets and all are great, they’re just background to the Michael story.

      • Tin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I like Discovery, but I have to agree. So many of the narrative problems could have been solved by simply giving the line(s) of dialogue in which Burnham solves a problem to someone else on the bridge. Easy peasy. Mix it up.

      • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah the show would be so much better if they didn’t rely on Burnham as the “solver of all things”. Literally the first thing they do with her when she walks into Starfleet Command after the time jump is go “YO HAVE YOU TRIED THIS SOLUTION TO THE PRIONS?”. It’s like the writers can’t help themselves.

        I wouldn’t be surprised if she has a stupid, uninspired speech that is a “These are the voyages” rip off at the end of the finale episode right before they inexplicably promote her to the Admiralty. It would be a fitting f*** you to end the show right in line with what the writers have done so far.

    • dasJot@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      In my head Discovery will always be ST:MBS - The Michael Burnham Show.

  • katy ✨@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    when i was a kid, i used to watch tng with my dad every saturday when i went to his house. the only bad thing about picard and discovery is that i wasn’t able to watch it with my dad.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    I like Frakes.

    That said, in also like pretty much all Trek. I’m not a big fan of some of the series, but I don’t hate them, nor am I going to go around saying they’re “not trek” because reasons.

    I’m looking forward to seeing more from the franchise, and I feel a bit alone in my universal enjoyment of Trek. There’s so many people hating on disco or Picard or whatever… I enjoy all of it.

    I also enjoy Star wars and Orville, and Stargate, and pretty much most sci-fi… The only stuff, that’s popular, that I have no opinion on is Babylon 5, mainly because I have not watched any of it. Between that, the og BSG and some of the star wars properties (like the animated shows), I’ve watched almost all of the mainstream sci-fi, and honestly, it’s all pretty damn good.

    I really liked how they forced the issue about time travel in disco, where the time machine suit thing wouldn’t go unless she went back to all the points she needed to in order to bring this circumstance to happen. I thought that was spot on. I try to ignore the multitude of time paradoxes in voy, and there are many, but it’s probably my least favorite part of that specific show, too much time shit, and it’s all done very poorly.

    • Doubletwist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      The only stuff, that’s popular, that I have no opinion on is Babylon 5, mainly because I have not watched any of it

      I highly recommend you watch it. Just keep in mind the first season (esp the first half) is tough, some bad dialog and acting. But it has important character and setting development.

      The end of season 1 things get better, and by the first few episodes of season 2 you’ll be hooked.

      At the end of the day, I bet you’ll acknowledge that B5 has BOTH some of the worst writing/acting you’ll see in a TV show, AND some of the best writing/acting you’ll ever see anywhere.

  • Facebones@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t mind people not liking discovery, such is the nature of these things.

    People who claim Discovery isn’t Trek then swoon over Picard in the same comment can eat my whole ass though 😂

    • roofuskit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      The show that was rewritten because it was too Trek? I really wanted to love Picard, but you’re right.

  • Stormygeddon@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I was going to mention “you could’ve also said ‘first Star Trek since Enterprise to end’” but then I realized I forgot about Picard.

    I was going to ask “But what about Prodigy” but that hasn’t actually aired its second season yet.

    So yeah, first Star Trek show since The Animated Series to end without having Two Takes Frakes, even though I feel that having him on the director’s chair should count.