• Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I believe it’s still among the most reliable tools for the job and actually quite humane. Just a bit messy.

  • Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    It was way better than some drunk guy in a hood with a dull axe. I think I remember reading about some teen who suicided themselves with a homemade guillotine in the woods. I don’t know why I’m mentioning that.

  • Scrof@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s still is the most humane and reliable form of the capital punishment. Electric chair and lethal injections are a stuff of nightmares.

  • avalanche@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m not for capital punishment (because there is always a chance justice failed), but if you are going to do it, might as will do it in a way that is quick, accurate, reliable, will cost little, and have few complexities. Lethal injection is a mess. Electrocution is ridiculous. Hanging is not super reliable. Gunshot it not quick. Maybe we need guillotine 2.0. Like, if we were to create a modern version of it, what would it look like? What would be the improvements to the design? Hell, there is probably a simulator on Steam for this question already. lol

    • saplyng@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Well, I suppose you first need to consider what’s doing the work on a guillotine; as far as I can tell it’s only using gravity to drop the blade. So we’d want to reduce any friction caused by the rails, it’d be easiest to upgrade to aluminum and get some sort of ball bearings or something to keep it as low as possible. Obviously we want a sharp a blade as possible - considering our lack of sustained killings it might be best to move to a one use blade mechanism to keep it pointy since we probably don’t have to worry about durability with sustained beheadings.

      Hmm, after that we should probably try to introduce more energy into the system since we’re still just using gravity. Adding more weight would probably help but wouldn’t ever make it go faster than terminal velocity. Maybe the cheapest option would be spring-loading the top of the guillotine so after the lever is pulled it shoots down. Or if you want more future-y could try to make some sort of magnet railgun to propel the blade down at increasingly fast speeds.

      For the bottom it seems pretty good, though you’ll want to make sure you have the executioner line up the blade to be in-between the vertebrae (gotta try and make it as swift as possible). Then maybe add a pillow, because it doesn’t look super comfy there.

  • LasVenturas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    What else did you think the guillotine was? Like it’s not talked about alot but if you get beheaded it didn’t always go well or in one swing.

  • ArugulaZ@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It makes for a faster, more efficient execution. This was not what its creator had intended… he just wanted to take executioners too drunk to feel guilt or aim precisely out of the equation. I think he went to his grave regretting his invention, as it was so frequently used during the French Revolution that dogs and cats would lap up the spilled blood.

  • aeternum@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now we have lethal injections where it takes hours to die and they’re in pain the whole time. How about we don’t kill people?

    • bane_killgrind@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So it’s a bit of a privileged position to say that.

      Has nobody committed acts against you that you could defend yourself from if they were dead?