• snooggums
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    That is completely irrelevant in this context.

    • MJKee9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      How is it irrelevant? If you are going to be so dismissive, you could at least use a “because” followed by reasoning… Otherwise i will dismiss your conclusion as flawed… Because at this point it is.

      • snooggums
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Every possible choice will have an exception for someone who have a mental health disorder that keeps them from being able to make a choice. Your example is an irrelevant outlier that does not contradict the reality that 99.99% of people in the same position can make the choice

        • MJKee9@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Your assumption and conclusion is incorrect based on my experience. Why do you think people with personality disorders disproportionately populate executive positions in corporations? Why are sociopaths great surgeons? Look at rates of alcoholism and suicide amongst professions, and then tell me if those rates support your conclusion that mental health issues amongst those who make money is an outlier.