• MNByChoice
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I am sure there is an official answer, but I am going to wing it.

    Inflation is from too much money chasing too few goods.

    UBI will free you from having to live in a specific place. Or if not you, some of your neighbors.

    Guaranteed housing tends to be shitty. Think of the worst people running the program and them hitting the lowest standards most times.

    With money, you can decide the housing trade-offs. Save money on rent and spend more elsewhere, or the reverse. With money, you have flexibility.

    • Wogi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Guaranteed housing tends to be shitty.

      Except there’s no reason it needs to be.

      It can be good, and there are parts of the developed world where public housing is not only abundant, but decent. And it has a cooling effect on the housing market, making all housing more affordable for everyone.

      If we provide, decent, low cost housing to enough, everyone that needs housing prices to come down benefit.

      • MNByChoice
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Except there’s no reason it needs to be.

        Sure. We could setup regulations, have inspectors, an oversight board, a series of escilating fines, and both local and federal authorities ensuring that each other is don’t the right thing. We would get mostly decent housing. Sounds expensive.

        What happens when you need a bigger place, or don’t need as much? Want to get away from a loud neighbor, or closer to work? Sounds like forms and approvals. Time off work for meeting with authorities.

        Current housing programs have huge waiting lists, and are different for different cities/counties/states. I am sure it works well for some people that made it through the paperwork and line.

        All of that send worse than giving people money.