In launch event on Friday, agency shared plans to test over US cities to see if it’s quiet enough by engaging ‘the people below’

Nasa has unveiled a one-of-a-kind quiet supersonic aircraft as part of the US space agency’s mission to make commercial supersonic flight possible.

In a joint ceremony with Lockheed Martin Skunk Works in Palmdale, California, on Friday, Nasa revealed the X-59, an experimental aircraft that is expected to fly at 1.4 times the speed of sound – or 925mph (1,488 km/h).

The aircraft, which stands at 99.7ft (30.4 metres) long and 29.5ft wide, has a thin, tapered nose that comprises nearly a third of the aircraft’s full length – a feature designed to disperse shock waves that would typically surround supersonic aircraft and result in sonic booms.

  • Landsharkgun
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    6 months ago

    Please don’t. We need to be reducing air travel, not increasing it. Go invent a quiet supersonic train or something.

    • Narauko@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      What is your plan for intercontinental travel? Increased ship travel, taking a week and burning massive amounts of crude fuel oil? Just cut off the Americas and Australia from Europe, Africa and Asia for non-commercial purposes? The supersonics have mostly been used for trans-atlantic and trans-pacific travel.

      • llii@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 months ago

        Less and more efficient airplanes. Supersonic aircraft will consume more fuel.

      • HollandJim@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        These kinds of comments only say it’s wrong; they never make a valid contribution to finding a solution.

        • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          The guy you’re replying to or the nonce suggesting we shelve all transportation technology and only use trains?

            • R0cket_M00se@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              Oh good, he has too many upvotes for me to assume but I figured.

              It’s such a shame, you’d think these communities would be about how advancement is always good due to it unlocking new possibilities. For example, maybe this aircraft will open up doors in hypersonic flight that could be used to make more efficient SSTO model and get us less dependent on fossil fuels for chemical rockets via traditional means. Or allows materials science to make a leap forward that revolutionizes fusion.

              To just say “why are we doing this?” Is an absolutely insane perspective for R&D and a fundamental misunderstanding of the way we develop technologies.

              • HollandJim@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                I think part of the issue is that the fine granularity of Lemmy (or the other place we don’t speak of) doesn’t lend easily to broader topics but instead seems to pull in “only THIS” or “only THAT” binary thinking. Only bikes or only trains or only trams doesn’t help when you need to cross continents.

      • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        sailing and solar power exists, and i’m pretty dang certain we could get an ocean liner to cross the atlantic in less than a week with modern tech. Also probably still less emissions than air travel considering how absurly much fuel that uses.

        • Narauko@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          There is a reason the tall masted rigged ships disappeared for regular travel; most people don’t want to take a month to cross the ocean in close quarters. Cruise ships are the closest analog to a long haul jet, and are no better to twice as CO2 producing than the airline travel, and the fuel they burn is the lowest grade fuel oil with the worst additional pollution. If you are moving across the ocean, or even just traveling, most people won’t be able to pilot their own sailing yacht and take 15-30 days to do it.

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      That’s called a hyperloop, nobody liked the idea.

      I think the next innovation will be slow electric powered lighter than air travel. Airships may be the future.

      That and these new supersonic planes, they’re already happening. Boom supersonic is currently testing their demonstration plane based on this nasa project.

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        6 months ago

        That’s called a hyperloop, nobody liked the idea.

        I think the next innovation will be slow electric powered lighter than air travel. Airships may be the future.

        That and these new supersonic planes, they’re already happening. Boom supersonic is currently testing their demonstration plane based on this nasa project. Their next step is to build a supersonic business class jet.

          • awwwyissss@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            6 months ago

            We’re in the middle of the 5th mass extinction, it’s caused by humans. Climate change is just now starting to actually take effect, and we’re locked into many decades of increased disasters and loss of habitable land as the population careens into absolutely record numbers. I could keep going.

            • Aux@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              6 months ago

              The planet is fine though. It’s not the first extinsion, it’s not the last. All previous ones were caused by some type of living creature as well.

              • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                6 months ago

                the planet is fine, sure, but do you want to live on the surface of venus? i would personally find that somewhat lethal and prefer being able to breathe the air without immediately dying from carbon monoxide poisoning

                • Aux@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  4
                  ·
                  6 months ago

                  So that’s what you should talk about - you don’t care about the planet, you care about yourself. I don’t care how would you feel on the surface of the Venus, I want my fast planes!