• zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      my dude, i haven’t booted into windows in ages. but that proves my exact point: it might save one time if ones workflow involves a lot of tasks that can be scripted. if ones workflow is “launch photoshop; browse the web for inspiration; draw for a bit; close photoshop.”, it won’t save any time. especially due to the hassle of getting photoshop working, or learning a new app like gimp or krita.

      • dustojnikhummer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        launch photoshop; browse the web for inspiration; draw for a bit; close photoshop

        hAvE yOu tRiEd GiMp?

        • average Linux fanboy. Thank you for not being one of those!
        • RCKLSSBNDN@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Oh man, that reminds me of the one time I promised a friend to make a poster for an event and my windows lappy died the next day. I had to shoehorn the project into gimp on my tiny netbook.

          It was painful. I’m glad for knowing how to use gimp in a pinch, and it is quite powerful software, but it felt like every tool and setting was in the wrong place after working with PS for so long.

          Also, it goes without saying that designing a full sized poster on a 10" screen is a fools errand.

        • zeus ⁧ ⁧ ∽↯∼@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          to be fair, i actually prefer gimp. but i recognise that different things work for different people, and often it’s not worth learning new software unless it brings significant advantages