nohaybanda [he/him]@hexbear.net to videos@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agophysics crackpots: a 'theory'www.youtube.comexternal-linkmessage-square5fedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down10file-text
arrow-up10arrow-down1external-linkphysics crackpots: a 'theory'www.youtube.comnohaybanda [he/him]@hexbear.net to videos@hexbear.netEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square5fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareAwoo [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoLmao she calls economics a “hard science” when talking about Nate Silver Liberal economics is not a hard science.
minus-squarenohaybanda [he/him]@hexbear.netOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoHer heart is in the right place, bless her, but whatever theory she’s read isn’t Marxist.
minus-squareAwoo [she/her]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up0·1 year agoShe can probably be fixed, just need to ask her what would happen if the crackpots were in charge of the sciences, then explain that is what has happened to economics via the chicago school.
minus-squareLlituro [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 year agoI can fix her (in this equation, I = richard wolf and the first volume of capital)
Lmao she calls economics a “hard science” when talking about Nate Silver
Liberal economics is not a hard science.
Her heart is in the right place, bless her, but whatever theory she’s read isn’t Marxist.
She can probably be fixed, just need to ask her what would happen if the crackpots were in charge of the sciences, then explain that is what has happened to economics via the chicago school.
I can fix her (in this equation, I = richard wolf and the first volume of capital)