• Serinus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    140
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    8 months ago

    You think we’re gonna fight corporations as individuals if we strangle government?

    No. Government is our protection from those who would want to consolidate power, especially corporations. I understand that the government often fails at that protection, but it’s still a hell of a lot better than being completely defenseless.

    The whole point of the founding fathers was to spread power and attempt to keep it spread. They wanted to avoid both the abuses of monarchy and the eventual decapitation of leadership (seeing as how that’d be their heads).

    • makyo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      8 months ago

      It ain’t going well for the little guy lately - the thread in my Lemmy right below this one is “Amazon, SpaceX and other companies are arguing the government agency that has protected labor rights since 1935 is actually unconstitutional”.

      The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the working man that labor unions were gasp COMMUNIST

      • psud@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Wouldn’t it be an interesting few years if governments banned companies from owning companies (maybe with carve outs for pension funds)

    • Septimaeus@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      Government is our megazord. Got it.

      megazord transforming

      Edit: added wiki link for the curious. In short, episodes of the Power Rangers often end with the rangers battling a monster that inevitably revives as a much larger, Godzilla-scale version.

      As the rangers are suddenly too small to fight the larger foe that towers above them, they must instead organize their individual vehicles into one giant “megazord” — a large mech, like a gundam crossed with a transformer — in order to defeat the enemy.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      That only works if it can be meaningfully said that the working class directs the state, rather than the owner class. In America, the Owner Class dominates the state via lobbying and being able to contribute to election campaigns.

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        The working class directs the state. The owning class directs the working class. The owning class doesn’t give two shits about abortion beyond how they can use it to get the people they want elected.

        It’s why they bother with Fox News and all this propaganda. At the end of the day they still need votes.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          The Working Class does not direct the state, because they must pick between candidates chosen by the Owner Class. The system itself is designed to protect the Owner Class, and it does so through picking representatives to prevent truly democratic processes.

          Fox, CNN, NYT, all of the major media outlets owned by the same group of companies serve as the bread and circuses to distract the Workers.

          • Serinus@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Yes, the owning class are the ones who picked George Santos. Not just anyone can run. He was the chosen one.

            Things are difficult, yes. They’re not completely hopeless.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              George Santos never rocked the boat and was never a threat.

              Reform into a worker-controlled system is largely impossible, but that doesn’t mean the situation is hopeless. The system needs to be replaced.

              The Founding Fathers built the state to support the interests of the Owner Class, because they were Owners.

    • Altomes@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      One might argue that the government is there to protect the minority of the opulent against the majority. James Madison certainly did

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Thus the beheading part. Spreading power was good for everyone.

        I’d rather have a billion USD as an American citizen than have 10 billion USD as a Russian oligarch. For some reason the GOP doesn’t seem to understand why.

    • intensely_human@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes. The point of government is to fight things too big for us to fight ourselves. That is the only reason government has to exist. All the other things are nice to have features, but a government is a fighting force.

      That doesn’t mean we give up our own weapons though. We need an army to fight the other armies, law to fight the power of money, and government for those. But we also need weapons of our own to prevent the government from physically fighting us.

      Our weapons keep the government polite. The government keeps other governments and other large organizations polite.

      It’s the minimum structure necessary for a society where respectful interaction is the norm.

      All these weapons and power structuring aren’t about dominating. They’re about maintaining a power balance to prevent domination … and make space for respect and trade.

      Government therefore exists in order to:

      • Prevent any individual from dominating any other individual, creating guaranteed space for respectful trade
      • Ensure the first item by having enough physical power (army) to control any individual including removing them
      • Also configure that army to oppose other armies so that they can’t come dominate the local individuals
      • Be unable to dominate the whole polity if it fights together (government carries a sword but each individual carries a small knife; only large groups of individuals can oppose the sword)

      It all starts from needing a way to enforce nobody is dominating anyone else.

      • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        What i take away from this is that when an individual becomes too powerful (e.g. rich) it becomes a threat for the government and the government should consider it a threat and intervene. Yes, I’m talking about the billionaires.