For those who aren’t aware, Kbin Cafe is a Kbin instance I run. Cross-posting our stance on Threads for visibility.

As Meta’s new App Threads has now launched, it’s important that I definitively state our stance on blocking federation with Meta if they choose to adopt ActivityPub:

Kbin Cafe will not be preemptively fediblocking Meta. However, I’ll be keeping a close watch on the situation as it unfolds, with my finger hovering over the block button. My first priority is the integrity and safety of the community, and with this in mind there won’t be any second chances given to Meta–their first strike results in a block.

Efforts are being coordinated by @tchambers and others to build out Fediverse test suites to ensure that all new actors (like Threads) that claim ActivityPub compliance have to prove their claims or be shown where they are lacking. That is the one real defense against “Embrace, Extend, Extinguish” plays by any large actor. To join in and help with this, follow this Frendica group here:
https://kbin.cafe/m/activitypubtestsuite@venera.social

This ActivityPub Test Suite needs to happen ASAP, so any dev support is welcome!

As always, feel free to comment here or message me with any questions or concerns.

  • livus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Most importantly: Making non-backwards compatible changes

    That’s the shift into “Extend” - they won’t do this until their Embrace phase has enmeshed their users with other fediverse users so that defederation affects people’s subscriptions.

    • Teppic@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m actually hoping Google or Microsoft or Apple etc create a compatible activity pub based service. That would create balance and make ‘extend’ problematic for meta.

      I also think we need state actors and universities to start using Mastodon (not Twitter) - again that would make it difficult for Meta to deviate from standards.