• nat_turner_overdrive [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        9 months ago

        How was it they lived there before? I wonder what happened. I wonder who stole land, murdered thousands of people, and turned themselves into the enemy of everyone in the region?

        (it was zionists. the zionist project created this strife intentionally to push jews to israel. zionists made their bed and they’re not going to get sympathy because now it’s inconvenient for them.

          • InappropriateEmote [comrade/them, undecided]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            You can play the blame game all you want, but what’s going to help anyone today?

            Well isn’t that fucking rich, since Israel right now today is committing a genocide, a real, actual ethnicity-wiping-out, mass-child-murder genocide. I think we can go ahead and “play the blame game” there and blame Zionists for doing a bit worse than an oopsie. What makes you saying that even more tone deaf is that the Zionists are trying to victim-blame it on Palestinians! Maybe once everyone understands who really is to fucking blame here, it will make helping people today a lot more possible.

            I am not personally responsible for what people did decades before I was born.

            You are personally responsible for any ways in which you benefit from the continued oppression of a people whose stolen land many of them were murdered for that you continue to live on.

            Why – and where – should I evacuate?

            Why? You’re asking why should you give back something your parents stole from people that are still asking for it back (the ones who survived anyway)? As for where you should “evacuate,” you could probably just stay there in the post-occupation Palestine, it just wouldn’t be an apartheid ethnostate, rather a state that doesn’t deny the human rights of people by their ethnicity and religion and actually affords justice with equity, part of which includes returning land to those individual people and families it was stolen from. In fact if you’re not in a house that literally belonged to a violently-evicted Palestinian family, or in a house that was built over the bulldozed ruins of homes of Palestinians, then you may be fine living exactly where you are right now. I know you have the settler-colonial mindset of being afraid of violent reprisal for the crimes your parents previously committed and your government currently is committing, but no, actually most people even after horrendous oppression don’t feel the need or even desire to go on a killing spree of their oppressors. White settler South Africans were afraid of that too, but no, turns out oppressed people tend not to behave like violent settler colonists themselves did. If you were still afraid of that anyway, you could as you said, evacuate since from my understanding many western states would sponsor you to move there.

            Two states living peacefully side by side is the only future that isn’t a genocide.

            This is complete nonsense. I hope you read the rest of the thread, because this fact has been made clear. There is precedent for this.

              • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                22
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                Why do you think a new state being formed would be worse than the current genocidal settler colonial state slaughtering children for sport?

                  • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    15
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    I didn’t ask you if it was or not. Why do you think a new state would be worse than the present genocidal settler-colonial state of Israel?

                    In order to be against a new one-state solution, you’d have to prove why you think the present situation is preferable, or that there aren’t better alternatives.

                    As it stands, you are tacitly approving the genocide and settler-colonialism, even if you don’t morally agree with it, which is why I am asking what your problem with a one-state solution is.

      • CyborgMarx [any, any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        Yeah no, the one state is the only future, and if you’re squatting in a Palestinian family’s home your ass is getting evicted so you best come to terms with that

        I hope you enjoy your future Palestinian citizenship and can look back on your old racist self with disgust and shame, it’s honestly more than you deserve