I get the whole “this isnt new” sentiment but we cant just swap right back to 100% wind power without developing NEW wind propulsion methods. We need to either match the speed of engine powered ships or increase efficiency (like this has).
Unless you want to go back to ships taking many more months or years to cross the ocean like they used to. Being snarky about ships using wind again is completely the wrong attitude to have if we want to make this work.
The long term solution is probably a combination of technologies - hydrogen and solar to power some propellers cleanly, batteries to regulate the solar and wind power, new and improved “sails” like this, channeling energy from waves, new types of coating that significantly reduce friction and increase gliding factor, new much lighter containers to reduce total weight, etc…
Probably just need to use biofuels and or very large battery systems. Generating enough energy on a vessel of that size probably isn’t feasible. Could maybe switch to nuclear instead that seems risky
Giving all these ships access to nuclear generators would be really bad.
Biofuel tanks might work in some situations, but it would either take away from shipping volume or limit access due to height of the ship.
Why would it take away from shipping volume? A biodiesel or equivalent shouldn’t take up any more room then current field?
Bio fuels are typically less energy dense than dinosaur squeezings. Diesel is around 40 mega joules per liter. Biodiesel is around 33.
So in this example you only get 82.5% of the energy unless you increase capacity of the fuel tanks, which would decrease the available space for cargo.
Next they should replace the diesel engines with bigass electric motors, and put solar panels over every top surface of the vessel that they can, and even possibly on the sail-wings too. Wind and solar powered shipping would be a good combo since there are plenty of both out on the seas. Charge the boat batteries at port as needed, cruise while collecting solar power etc
Great idea but a cargo ship has like 2% top surface showing, the rest is containers of future landfill :(
I’m sure they could put temporary solar panels on the containers. It would be more work but would it save enough on fuel to make it worth it? Who knows.
It would be more work but would it save enough on fuel to make it worth it? Who knows.
Even without doing the math, I feel pretty confident saying that the answer is “no.”
The amount of fuel these ships consume to propel themselves is astronomical. Petroleum fuel has a waaaayy higher energy density than lithium batteries. Around 46 MJ/kg vs 6 MJ/kg…it’s simply not practical.
Nuclear ships on the other hand…
Edit: This isnt really a fair comparison because of the efficiency differences between ICEs and electric motors but it does show the energy storage inefficiency per kg of current battery storage technologies. Not sure if there’s a better comparison metric to use…
maybe a roll-out top made of those flexible panels that is extended when ship is loaded. I guess securing it though with wind and stuff might be a problem
Could make a solar roof on hinges over the cargo
I have a 4’x10’ flatbottomed boat. Of the 40sq./ft. I cover 45% in solar to make a modest trolling motor go 6-7mph. Weight with myself, wife, battery, cells, misc. gear: 300lbs.
Solar ain’t gonna get it on a cargo ship weighing 165,000 tons and a couple of football fields long.
Flat bottomed boats they make the rocking world go round.
Maybe something like diesel-electric that they use with trains with solar panels providing some of the electricity is a more realistic thought.
Batteries are part of what I said, which you seem to be ignoring. A ship that huge could hold some huge-ass batteries to power the bigass motors. Sodium-ion batteries would be the ideal solution with presently available technology.
Nowhere near the power density needed to get the job done
Not even close to enough surface area to power them with solar. Even if the entire ship held up a solar array that completely shadowed the ship would it be enough.
They already are propelled by electric motors - but the electricity is generated by massive fossil fuelled generators.
I look forward to hydrogen-fueled ships and hydrogen-fueled planes. That’s going to be fun.
Are you copyrighting your comment?
Against commercial AI, yes.
Can an instance blanket copyright all of their users comments?
Also, I’m not sure why you’re getting down voted, sorry.
Can an instance blanket copyright all of their users comments?
They probably get the right to distribute it because that’s their primary purpose. But I’m not sure if they get the right to distribute it under another license? No idea… copyright is beyond me.
However, if it gets commercial AI makers in trouble, that’s fine by me.Also, I’m not sure why you’re getting down voted, sorry.
Eh, not a problem. They’re just make believe points. Of no importance.
Wow… The innovation… Sails on ships… Next they add wheels to sleighs, These nerdy bastards
can’t we just enjoy positive changes for a second?
Rather than usual sails these are solid and foldable and act more like plane wings
I mean sails form an aerofoil but these are ridged aerofoils.
Its actually better than sails as they can be folded away and there are no masts That could hinder the ship driving under a bridge.
deleted by creator
deleted by creator
Sails can be folded away and what do you call those big vertical things in the picture?
Sails cannot be folded away, they can be rolled in, this however doesn’t change the hight of the mast they are on. Also the weight/drag ratio seems to be better.
We can’t find fabric anymore? Shit. And I suppose we can’t collapse a mast the way these guys collapse a mast if there’s fabric involved. Oh well.
Fabric breaks a lot faster than a metal sheet…
Bro do you really think that? 🤣🤣🤣🤣
We have dramatically better flexible teenage materials than any metal you can think of. Ever heard of kevlar? That’s only the cheapest and most well known example too! Don’t tell me you’re not embarrassed to have said that shit.
I will just block you now, you are annoying, you don’t understand shit (or don’t want to) and you are immature.
lowkey tired of being able to guess the exact snarky deadpan top comment before opening the post
no hate to you commenter. :) its a funny comment and the world is fucked i just wish we could for once be genuinely happy and celebrate that engineers are helping us do better
Boomerhumor
That’s a good start. Now get rid of the rest of the diesel fuel used.
IIRC it still burns a crapload of regular fuel, say 14T a day; so yeah, it’s a savings, but it needs to be better.
Any savings is a good step. stop discounting those steps
14% gain is still extremely good.
