As an enthusiast that takes portraits, travel, some macro, some wildlife, and a desire to do more sports and birding; I’ve always wanted to upgrade my SL1 to a full frame sensor/mirrorless.

Price is a big deal for me, and I want to buy once cry once–i want a camera that will last me the next 8+ years. Reviews on the RP look great, and I don’t pretend to be an expert–im confused though, because while the R6 mkii has a few nice features I can’t see why it costs twice as much. Is the R6 mkii worth the upgrade, and/or will it be more future proof?

  • Zak@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    It was pretty well-documented - here’s one source. Most of the manufacturers have some sort of limits or controls on third-party lenses, usually with patents that should have failed the obviousness test. I believe the state of the mirrorless ecosystem is:

    Third-party AF lenses forbidden:

    • Canon RF

    Third-party lenses approved on a case-by-case basis:

    • Fuji X
    • Fuji GFX
    • Nikon Z

    Open (some may charge a license fee):

    • Sony E
    • Micro four-thirds
    • L-mount