• disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    8 months ago

    No. I’m not. I’m debating the point that Israel attacked “first,” just as you said, in a 40 year long conflict.

    • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      That’s not what you said, you said Israel could claim justification for bombing an embassy because enemies were in it. Then you made a vague comment about how long the conflict is, as if that excuses it. If that is true, then all israeli embassies are fair game because Mosaad is in them and US embassies as well since they openly have CIA officers in them.

      Firing missiles into a country to blow up an embassy of another country is a “first” no matter what justification you or Israel can come up with.

      • disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        I said “one could claim it was retaliation” referring to the Houthi Red Sea attacks. My point is this has been going back and forth for 40 years.

        • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          So the guy with a week old account is condescending. I’m pretty sure I’ve read and taught more history than you. Peace.