It is a scenario playing out nationwide. From Oregon to Pennsylvania, hundreds of communities have in recent years either stopped adding fluoride to their water supplies or voted to prevent its addition. Supporters of such bans argue that people should be given the freedom of choice. The broad availability of over-the-counter dental products containing the mineral makes it no longer necessary to add to public water supplies, they say. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention says that while store-bought products reduce tooth decay, the greatest protection comes when they are used in combination with water fluoridation.

The outcome of an ongoing federal case in California could force the Environmental Protection Agency to create a rule regulating or banning the use of fluoride in drinking water nationwide. In the meantime, the trend is raising alarm bells for public health researchers who worry that, much like vaccines, fluoride may have become a victim of its own success.

The CDC maintains that community water fluoridation is not only safe and effective but also yields significant cost savings in dental treatment. Public health officials say removing fluoride could be particularly harmful to low-income families — for whom drinking water may be the only source of preventive dental care.

“If you have to go out and get care on your own, it’s a whole different ballgame,” said Myron Allukian Jr., a dentist and past president of the American Public Health Association. Millions of people have lived with fluoridated water for years, “and we’ve had no major health problems,” he said. “It’s much easier to prevent a disease than to treat it.”

According to the anti-fluoride group Fluoride Action Network, since 2010, over 240 communities around the world have removed fluoride from their drinking water or decided not to add it.

  • WldFyre@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    And how do you know what doses people are getting?

    Lol just like an anti-vaxxer. Where’s your evidence of water having dangerous doses exceeding regulations or what exceeding the levels the utility says they use? Bonus points if you’re able to find levels that exceed what’s actually safe for humans.

    • mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      Where’s your evidence of water having dangerous doses

      Why should I have to provide evidence of dangerous doses of drugs in my tap water. Don’t add drugs to tap water.

      • WldFyre@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Lmfao because it’s not dangerous! We’ve done it for decades to tens if not hundreds of millions of people, with no negative effects. And we have proven medical benefits.

        Just because at stronger doses than we use in drinking water can cause problems doesn’t mean we shouldn’t use it, that logic would apply to anything, salt, sugar, caffeine, etc.

        Just because you get scared of things you don’t understand doesn’t mean you should dictate what other people get to do, ya goofball. Read a book sometime.

        • mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Don’t put drugs in tap water, safety profile doesn’t matter.

          Vitamin C is safe, should we add that? Should we add every safe beneficial substance?

          There are better ways to medicate people than dosing the tap water.