The problem with e-bike subsidies like this is that they require buying from a local retailer. It’s great for small business, I guess, but it means the final cost even after the rebate ends up higher than buying a direct-sell brand (e.g. Lectric, Rad) — let alone sketchy eBay junk — unsubsidized.
They need to think about whether their goal is “buy local” or to actually get people on bikes.
This is indeed a valid consideration. At the same time, ebikes open doors for people that maybe haven’t ridden a bicycle since childhood, and might not know the first thing about assembling – let alone maintaining – a bicycle made for transportation, rather than as a children’s toy. Throw in the whole (somewhat misplaced) concern over cheap batteries bursting into flames and it’s not totally outside reason why the Colorado government went in this direction. Encouraging/subsidizing local bike shops as part of the rollout of ebikes could be viewed as taking the long-term approach.
Some mail-order e-bikes require assembly, but others don’t. For example, I own two Lectrics, an XPedition and an XPeak. The XPedition came fully-assembled except for some quick-release pedals (that the company spec’d specifically so it’d be even more trivial than screw-in ones), and the XPeak required the same kind of pedals plus putting the front wheel on. If I’m not mistaken, the other bikes that company makes require literally no assembly at all.
Anyway, although I’m sympathetic to the argument of trying to make biking as accessible as possible, I also think there’s a minimum standard of competency required to be considered a functioning adult, and things like being able to remove/reinstall a front wheel on a bike fall well within that. (Frankly, I think all cyclists ought to be able to replace an inner tube – front or rear – just as I think all car drivers ought to be able to put on a spare tire.)
The problem with e-bike subsidies like this is that they require buying from a local retailer. It’s great for small business, I guess, but it means the final cost even after the rebate ends up higher than buying a direct-sell brand (e.g. Lectric, Rad) — let alone sketchy eBay junk — unsubsidized.
They need to think about whether their goal is “buy local” or to actually get people on bikes.
This is indeed a valid consideration. At the same time, ebikes open doors for people that maybe haven’t ridden a bicycle since childhood, and might not know the first thing about assembling – let alone maintaining – a bicycle made for transportation, rather than as a children’s toy. Throw in the whole (somewhat misplaced) concern over cheap batteries bursting into flames and it’s not totally outside reason why the Colorado government went in this direction. Encouraging/subsidizing local bike shops as part of the rollout of ebikes could be viewed as taking the long-term approach.
Some mail-order e-bikes require assembly, but others don’t. For example, I own two Lectrics, an XPedition and an XPeak. The XPedition came fully-assembled except for some quick-release pedals (that the company spec’d specifically so it’d be even more trivial than screw-in ones), and the XPeak required the same kind of pedals plus putting the front wheel on. If I’m not mistaken, the other bikes that company makes require literally no assembly at all.
Anyway, although I’m sympathetic to the argument of trying to make biking as accessible as possible, I also think there’s a minimum standard of competency required to be considered a functioning adult, and things like being able to remove/reinstall a front wheel on a bike fall well within that. (Frankly, I think all cyclists ought to be able to replace an inner tube – front or rear – just as I think all car drivers ought to be able to put on a spare tire.)