United Airlines has blamed Boeing for a $200m (£161m) hit to its earnings in the first three months of this year.

The carrier was forced to ground its Boeing 737 MAX 9 fleet for three weeks after a mid-air cabin blowout on an Alaska Airlines flight in January.

United said that pushed it to a pre-tax loss of $164m for the first quarter.

  • jeffw@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Regardless of what you think of rich ass corporations, this is an important liability issue. United shouldn’t be on the hook for losing money when it was Boeing’s fault

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      39
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Then they should.sue Boeing like any other business. Picking a faulty vendor means sorting it out with the vendor.

      • Cyborganism@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        There ought to be an outright ban on Boeing airplanes and a class action lawsuit against the company for putting peoples’ lives in danger and causing reputation damages to flight companies.

  • pyrate37@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Alaskan Airlines as well. They kept getting pressure cabin alerts, never finding the problem, and just resetting the warning system. They even went so far as to instruct that this plane was not to go over water so it could land if it had an issue.

    The door plug is absolutely on Boeing but AA was negligent on how it handled the warning it got multiple times before the blowout happened.

    • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      7 months ago

      Boeing wrote the service manuals and maintainance schedule. If the airline was supposed to do a test to catch the mistake but didn’t, boeing would mention it.

      A door plug is part of the fuselage, and it is hidden behind wall panels. An airline isn’t expected to disassemble the entire interior to check the structure upon taking delivery of the plane.

      The pressure fault the plane had before the blowout wouldn’t have lead to a check of the door plug even if it had gotten the service before the blowout.

    • snooggums
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      There are like a million bolts on a plane, and not all are easily accessed or listed as things to check on regular maintenance. It sounds like these were not easily accessible.or seen and not something that would be regularly checked.

      Like how a lot of bolts on cars and trains and aubways are not readily accessible or checked before the vehicle is put into seevice becsuse it is assumed that the factory’s quality control took care of them.

    • OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      7 months ago

      If you bought a car and the door just fell off while you were driving to work one day, would it be your fault for not checking the bolts?

      • Hildegarde@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        It is much easier to check the bolts on your car door than the bolts on a door plug. They’re not hidden behind a wall like the door plug bolts.