Yep. Do not trust a word that unethical shit house puts out. Be it Bild, Welt, Business Insider, what have you. Once Axel Springer is involved, expect lots and lots of lies, “not quite but almost” lies and lies out of spite or self interest."
Nothing to do with bias. It’s a shitrag outlet. Most of their articles are stolen, or they just report on what other outlets are reporting - there’s hardly any original work and the clickbait is cheap shit .
I’ll bite. Why?
Removed by mod
Yep. Do not trust a word that unethical shit house puts out. Be it Bild, Welt, Business Insider, what have you. Once Axel Springer is involved, expect lots and lots of lies, “not quite but almost” lies and lies out of spite or self interest."
Removed by mod
One guess as to why they don’t trust it
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/business-insider/
That only confirmed that it’s fine to read. It doesn’t overtly move the Overton window.
Nothing to do with bias. It’s a shitrag outlet. Most of their articles are stolen, or they just report on what other outlets are reporting - there’s hardly any original work and the clickbait is cheap shit .
Mostly factual, center left. Which part is the reason why we shouldn’t be reading their news?
Guessing the people who don’t like it are those who don’t like the left or facts.
Gee I wonder who those could be
Who bias fact checks the bias fact checker?
Because he said so. /s