Who would have thought this would have happened?

  • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Restaurants are a luxury. Either the pay reflects that and they get paid a decent wage or the market will react somehow.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      3 months ago

      This was a government action and not a market action. As the article states, the people were happy with their pay. Now they don’t have a job and they are unhappy with their pay. The free market already had this under control.

      • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        3 months ago

        Everyone’s cost of living has increased post-pandemic, minimum wage need to rise. The restaurant could have raised their price as well but chose not to, either because they think their clientele can’t afford it (increased cost of living, which is what rising the minimum wage can offset), or because the market is already saturated and they’re no longer competitive.

        Something/someone has to give in when there’s inequality.

        • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          3 months ago

          By forcing a higher wage, they just created more inequality. Now these people don’t have jobs and the total number of jobs has been reduced.

          • m-p{3}@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            3 months ago

            And these vacant positions elsewhere also need to pay minimum wage. It’s a temporary setback until the system adjust to the new minimum.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              3 months ago

              The total job market is reducing. That means there will be fewer jobs. California already has higher unemployment. So they just created a worse situation for these people. The job market for them keep getting smaller.

                • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Wages are set by supply and demand. I blame the correct person in this situation. The California government

  • NataliePortland@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    This reminds me of a few years back when Seattle announced $15 minimum wage. The highest in the nation at the time. Conservatives were terrified but had they looked at the data they might have felt different. After all, “facts don’t care about feelings.” We don’t have to speculate about what would happen if minimum wages went up. Every single state in country, along with the Fed has raised min. wage multiple times. We can look at history to see that every time it leads to an improved economy.

    So what happened in Seattle? Are all the restuaurants closed? Are low wage workers out of jobs? Has Seattle failed? No quite the opposite. Washington, like all ‘blue’ states has a stronger economy than most other states. That’s why Fox doesn’t talk about it anymore. There was a ‘Foster Freeze’ in Seattle too that conservatives loved to trot out at the time. Forced to close because the mean old government demanded that people pay living wages. Of course we later learned that the owner wasn’t able to retain employees due to poor scheduling, wasn’t paying taxes and wasn’t paying vendors all long before the wage increase. Fox for some reason didn’t provide that update.

    And now they have found a new martyr to trot out. Of course this one even admits up front that the restaurant is EXEMPT from the law, and laments that she wasn’t given any warning! Somehow the rest of the nation knew this was happening. It seems the real issue is this: Why on Earth would anybody continue working at Foster Freeze when the Mcdonald’s next door is paying a living wage?

  • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 months ago

    He did blame it on the minimum wage increase. Although, from my understanding, I think we were exempt from it because of the amount of locations that he personally owns. But, he did ultimately blame it on that increase,” she said.

    So, this article is about the alleged effects of the California minimum wage increase despite the one piece of evidence not demonstrating the relationship between cause and effect?

    This is like saying climate change isn’t happening because the sun is burning hotter with your one piece of evidence being a scientist that says “The sun has nothing to do with climate change,”, and then blatantly insisting that climate change isn’t happening because of the sun.

      • PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        This was predicted from the start.

        The economic evidence for minimum wages increases points to either small shocks to low-wage labor and teenagers or no effect at all.

        That something was predicted at all is unsurprising. Economist especially have predicted that minimum wages increases will cause hell to break loose since Milton Friedman. But that’s never actually happened, and, as mentioned before, the evidence is that it doesn’t.

        So, what’s the magnitude of the negative consequences? No article has (or at this point, can) determine that. That just leaves conservatives with the rhetorical strategy of hyperbole, often emphasizing particularly damaging instances that aren’t representative of the norm. All y’all got is hot air.