• golli@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    As the article suggests level 3 autonomous driving really doesn’t sound like something i’d pay so much for. Level 4 is where it gets interesting, but that is the big jump. And I really don’t want to know how much manufacturers will charge for it, when they ask this much for level 3.

    I agree that companies shouldn’t be allowed to charge subscriptions for capabilities that the product is capable by itself. So without needing access to something like servers that also generate reoccurring costs.

    On the other hand I can understand how a reoccurring charge based on usage might make sense, if the manufacturer is liable for the vehicles actions while the system is active. That’s basically a insurance charge. However it feels like these things shouldn’t be bundled together.

    • copacetic@discuss.tchncs.deOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      There are no immediate plans for the OEMs to sell level 4 cars. They would have to charge you at least ten times as much for it if you compare the hardware of level 3 Mercedes with a Waymo taxi. Level 4 will only be available as taxi service for quite a while.

      The article mentions “2030” but that seems incredibly naive to me. They will probably just expand the use cases for Drive Pilot until then: Higher speeds, more street types, night time, more weather conditions, more edge cases like construction zones, etc.