cross-posted from: https://piefed.social/post/92667

  • A Seattle basic income pilot gave low-income residents $500 a month, nearly doubling employment rates.

  • Some participants reported getting new housing, while others saw their employment incomes rise.

  • Basic income pilots nationwide have seen noteworthy success, despite conservative opposition.

  • MajorHavoc@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    edit-2
    7 个月前

    Yep. We now know Univeraal Basic Income (UBI) works well, even when it’s not remotely enough to live on. People buy transport, or childcare, or medicine, or whatever they really need, to get to work.

    My un-generous hot take is that leaders opposed to UBI sure look like they’re only opposed, because UBI disrupts their plans to establish a slave class in the social strata.

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      7 个月前

      But that’s what I don’t understand. You can’t have a slave class if they’re all dead. Isn’t a slave class more useful, more productive, if they’re alive, reproducing, and consuming?

    • antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 个月前

      Bad idea. Next thing you know these guys will have enough free time to vote. And they’ll probably vote for stupid stuff like child care, education, bicycle infrastructure, and criminalizing food waste. It will basically become illegal to make a profit on basic human needs. And then what’s left for profiting?

  • n3m37h@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 个月前

    We did this in parts of Ontario Canada under the Liberals l, once the conservatives got in they axed the project with no reasoning. Don’t let this happen to y’all!

    • jorp@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 个月前

      The self fulfilling prophecy of government ineffectiveness under conservatism