• crapwittyname@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    Fair enough. A quick Google tells me the rate in the automotive industry is 6.3 per 100, which is close to SpaceX at 5.9 per 100. Might be more comparable to be fair.

    • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      That might be a closer comparison ya.

      Both work with large objects at large scale.

      Edit: And just because SpaceX is lower doesn’t mean it’s fine. There’s clearly room for large improvement, especially if injuries are due to moving too fast. I’d also intuitively expect higher numbers in automotive as things are larger scale (millions) and faster.