• jet@hackertalks.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 months ago

    I’m not sure where my logics breaking.

    We have a group of people, we cannot attribute who is a belligerent or not, we deny food and water to the entire group, we do not let any of the group Members leave, we bombed the group, this is textbook collective punishment. I’m not sure where the line is in your mind between a war and collective punishment.

    In my mind, if people are not allowed to opt out of the combat, it is collective punishment. In most wars, opting out simply means refugees walk away from the combat area. It’s still terrible, but at least they’re not directly involved in the combat.

    • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      In my mind, if people are not allowed to opt out of the combat, it is collective punishment.

      That is your opinion, but that isn’t how it is defined in law.

      opting out simply means refugees walk away from the combat area.

      If they hadn’t attacked all their neighbors, they would have a place to go.

      Hamas bears the bulk of the blame here. I do blame Israel for not providing food, water and medical care. That is their obligation, and the world would provide them resources to do it.

      • jet@hackertalks.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        7 months ago

        You’re conflating they the belligerents and they the civilians. You’re mixing these two groups.

        Which law are you referring to? Quite frankly even international law typically never gets applied inside of a country’s borders.

        Telling people they have to die, because of where they are born, is a terrible thing. I will stand by that regardless of how you define the labels.

          • jet@hackertalks.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            7 months ago

            Yes. The fire bombings on world war II were absolutely collective punishment.

            Collective punishment is a punishment or sanction imposed on a group for acts allegedly perpetrated by a member of that group, which could be an ethnic or political group, or just the family, friends and neighbors of the perpetrator.

            From the wiki you just linked. Can we agree that there are people who live in Gaza, who do not support Hamas, and who are not actively involved in the fighting? You’ve just said they have to convince Hamas to stop fighting before things can be " over "?

            You’re making uninvolved people, responsible for the actions of others. That fits the definition from Wikipedia that you just link to.

            • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              7 months ago

              No, they were attacking military tagets. They are not collective punishment.

              You’re making uninvolved people, responsible for the actions of others

              They are not uninvolved. That is their government that started the fight.

              I have very little empathy for the Palestinians. When they brought the hostages back, nobody stood up for them. Nobody tried to save any of them.

              • jet@hackertalks.com
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                7 months ago

                All right let’s go through a thought experiment: You’re a 16-year-old girl, you just had a baby. The father is dead. You want to leave the fighting zone. You’re not allowed to leave. How do you affect collective action, and change the government? The government which last had an election before you were born

                The fact that you and your baby cannot overthrow Hamas, is that enough reason for you to die?

                  • jet@hackertalks.com
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 months ago

                    I think that’s a catch-22. If you organize a protest and you get into a group. You’re very likely to be bombed.

                    We are saying a member of this collective, is responsible for the behavior of other members of that collective. And until they fix the collective behavior, they cannot leave the kill box. That’s unethical, that’s immoral, that’s collective punishment

                • Neuromancer@lemm.eeOPM
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  I agree the water, food and medical care are potentially collective punishment and at least against the rules of war.

                  The assault is not.

                  I’m not pleased Israel hasn’t done more to provide food, water and medical care.