His lawyer argued presidents can assassinate their political opponents at the Supreme Court today, and as if that’s not bad enough, they seem receptive to it.
Buddo, if you think crackhead lawyers arguing “The president ordering political assassinations is OK” is gonna fly and be the law of the land, I have a bridge to sell you!
Or, if youre right, Dark Brandon is about to be reeeeeeaaaaal busy.
A lawyer has a duty to attempt the most favorable outcome for their client, even if the methodology is insane. So long as it can be squeezed into some sort of logical interpretation of the law, or to argue the law is improper. It doesn’t mean they actually believe their own bullshit necessarily.
His lawyer argued presidents can assassinate their political opponents at the Supreme Court today, and as if that’s not bad enough, they seem receptive to it.
These are dark fucking times.
Buddo, if you think crackhead lawyers arguing “The president ordering political assassinations is OK” is gonna fly and be the law of the land, I have a bridge to sell you!
Or, if youre right, Dark Brandon is about to be reeeeeeaaaaal busy.
I admire your confidence while wondering where the hell you got it.
I mean, I heard the same attitude in 2016.
These things are unthinkable until they happen.
Biden doesn’t have the balls to so much as J walk with presidential immunity.
You are a very foolish person; the type who brings about the end times.
Ping me again when they rule and lmk if they OK assassinating political rivals, thanks
A lawyer has a duty to attempt the most favorable outcome for their client, even if the methodology is insane. So long as it can be squeezed into some sort of logical interpretation of the law, or to argue the law is improper. It doesn’t mean they actually believe their own bullshit necessarily.