After a day of protest and confusion on its Manhattan campus, Columbia University announced Monday evening that it had begun to suspend students who had not left a pro-Palestinian encampment by a 2 p.m. deadline.

The measure reflected the difficult balance Columbia administrators are seeking to strike as they try to avoid bringing the Police Department back to arrest those in the encampment, but also commit to the stance that the protest must end.

Students in the encampment, along with hundreds of supporters, had spent a tense afternoon rallying around the site in a show of force meant to deter the removal of its tents. But by 4 p.m., with no sign of police action, most of the protesters had begun to disperse, leaving only what appeared to be several dozen students and about 80 tents inside the encampment.

MBFC
Archive

  • girlfreddy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    40
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    If an educational institution won’t abid by the First Amendment it means they’re more interested in pumping out cogs for the machines of capitalism than they are teaching students critical thinking skills.

    Fuck Columbia and every other school that follows this path.

    • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      7 months ago

      Go read up about what the first amendment actually is and how it applies to private entities (hint: it doesn’t).

      • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        There is a difference from having to uphold a constitutional right by law or by principle of valuing the right.

        Free speech is essential for universities as it creates the space in which scientific discourse and development can strife. This is also why autocratic governments always crack down on universities and then within a few years the quality of research and teaching goes down the drain.

        By cracking down on students that were voicing their opinion Columbia declares that it does not want to be an university in that spirit anymore. It might not be a legal problem. But it is a complete moral failure.

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Was that the university that private the YouTube video saying protests were allowed on campus or was that another one?

          Either way, universities love to pretend they’re bastions of activism until they actually have to be about it.

        • Jarix@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          7 months ago

          “an university” this is worse than nails on a chalkboard or the word “moist”

        • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          7 months ago

          W safety of some students cannot be comprised by granting other students their freedom.

          • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            On all the Universities were police was brought it, it escalated the situation. We saw evidence of a pro-Israel protestor committing to antisemitic hate speech in order to get the police to violently crackdown on the peaceful anti-genocide protest.

            Meanwhile Jewish students and members of faculty from most campuses report that there was not threat towards them by the anti-genocide demonstrations

            • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              7 months ago

              Bad timing on your end. The Colombia protestors just raided one of the halls and barricaded themselves in.

              Tents on a lawn is one thing, even if they did nothing to silence the calls for hate among their ranks. Breaking (in the literal sense) into a building and causing damage is a whole level of escalation from the protestors. At what point do they shift into a violent riot?

              • DancingBear
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                Probably around the time when the pro Israeli groups start burning stuff and claim to be part of the protests

              • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                7 months ago

                So after police came in and violated people things escalated. You are confirming what i said.

                • DoomBot5@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  7
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  Nah, you have it backwards. The protestors broke into a building, so police was sent to get them out. It would be the same outcome as if you decided to break into a building and lock yourself in.

                  • Tryptaminev@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    arrow-down
                    3
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    The police raided the protest camp before. Stop playing the zionist game of “before the moment i say, nothing relevant happened!”