• chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Technically change isn’t a constant. Eventually everything will stop changing, because all of the atoms will have drifted too far apart to react to each other, and the universe will just be a thin soup of everything that will never touch anything ever again. Tomorrow is Wednesday, though, so only a few more days until the weekend!

        • ryannathans@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 months ago

          We don’t know that for fact, we can’t even agree on the age of the universe. Maybe there’s a big crunch

          • Zagorath@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            I don’t think it’s been ruled out for certain, but I believe the data is looking incredibly bad for big crunch enthusiasts, since the discovery of dark energy.

            Edit: from the Big Crunch Wikipedia page:

            The vast majority of evidence indicates that this hypothesis is not correct. Instead, astronomical observations show that the expansion of the universe is accelerating rather than being slowed by gravity, suggesting that a Big Chill is more likely. However, some physicists have proposed that a “Big Crunch-style” event could result from a dark energy fluctuation.

              • henfredemars@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                8 months ago

                I take issue with discovery. To say there’s a mysterious inexplicable expansion of the universe hardly qualifies as such. It sounds more like a failure to understand our physical laws than to posit the presence of mysterious and otherwise undetectable entity.

                • Zagorath@aussie.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  The use of the word “discovery” in this case was carefully considered. The discovery of “dark energy” refers to the effect: the unexpected acceleration of the expansion of space. The fact that the expansion is accelerating was a discovery, and dark energy is just the name given to “whatever causes that”.

        • SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          But by that point, cognition itself will be a physical impossibility, so is the the lack of change even real if there’s nothing to conceptualize its truth, and thus capable of declaring: “Nothing will ever change anymore”?

          • chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            You are mixing philosophy and fact. It doesn’t matter what can or can’t be perceived. If you blindfold yourself, the world doesn’t go away.

    • zurohki@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      8 months ago

      I met a traveller from an antique land,
      Who said—“Two vast and trunkless legs of stone
      Stand in the desert. . . . Near them, on the sand,
      Half sunk a shattered visage lies, whose frown,
      And wrinkled lip, and sneer of cold command,
      Tell that its sculptor well those passions read
      Which yet survive, stamped on these lifeless things,
      The hand that mocked them, and the heart that fed;
      And on the pedestal, these words appear:
      My name is Ozymandias, King of Kings;
      Look on my Works, ye Mighty, and despair!
      Nothing beside remains. Round the decay
      Of that colossal Wreck, boundless and bare
      The lone and level sands stretch far away.”

      - Percy Shelley