• john89@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    8 months ago

    Yikes.

    I’m like the exact opposite, but it’s mostly because I’ve had bad experiences with gangbangers.

    • Got_Bent@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      49
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 months ago

      I was lily white guy living in ground zero of MS13 gangland in Los Angeles in the early 2000s for four years. I know it’s crazy, but best neighbors I ever had. We all bbq’d together, watched each other’s kids, and got along well.

      One morning I was taking a bus to work. Two guys robbed me while I was standing at the bus stop. I had fifteen dollars, which I happily gave to them.

      I went over to my neighbor that evening and told him what happened.

      The next day, there was fifteen dollars in my mailbox.

      I moved from there to high end HOA in Texas and holy hell it was miserable. I hated them all. They were the nosiest, most judgemental assholes imaginable. One lady would go walking down the alleys checking how many beer cans people had in their recycling and called the police on one house charging them with child neglect because of beer cans in their recycling bin. Fuck that neighborhood forever.

      (There’s a funny coda to the robbery. I smoked a lot back then. When they were done shoving the gun in my ribs and walking away, I blurted out, “guys, I’m stressed. Do one of you have a light?” and I swear on a stack of books of your choice that one of them turned around and lit my cigarette)

      • Dr. Bluefall@toast.ooo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        There’s a certain weird honor in lighting the cigarette of the guy you just robbed. It’s kinda respectable.

      • millie@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        This is real. I’ve had folks in my cab that clearly were trying to probe my boundaries to see if I’m an easy target who immediately switched gears the moment I showed my personality. Just because someone is desperate doesn’t mean they want to fuck over someone who’s cool with them and is real. The way you carry yourself makes a difference.

        It’s pretty obvious if you meet me in person that I’m a broke artist who cares about real people and detests fake corporate bullshit. That’s not really an appealing target and I have fuck all to give them anyway.

        But if some fuck shoots me for being on their street while being trans, or literally just someone they don’t recognize, I don’t get the chance to show how I carry myself.

        • set_secret@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Weird the US slang version comes before the actual definition. Someone needs to edit that Wikipedia article.

          Every other dictionary (Including US ones)

          gangbang /găng′băng″/

          noun

          1. Sexual intercourse forced upon one person by several others in rapid succession.
          2. Sexual intercourse involving several people who select and change partners.
          3. Sexual intercourse involving more than two persons, especially with a high proportion of men.
          4. A street gang attacking random people on the streets and/or committing gang crimes.

          intransitive verb

          1. To participate in a gangbang, either consensually or as an aggressor.
          2. To participate in violent gang-related activities.
          3. To subject (someone) to a gangbang.
          • force@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            Whether a term is characteristic of a certain dialect or region isn’t generally considered all that much when it comes to order on Wiktionary, unless it’s an “obscure” dialect. I contribute a lot to Wiktionary (mainly for languages other than Modern English though) and there are few rules on the specific the order of definitions, it’s mostly just common definitions above uncommon definitions (but this isn’t even a hard rule).

            Editing it to change the order for your reason specifically might be considered vandalism, as it’s typical and allowed for entries to be like this and it’s common for little disputes like that to cause editing wars (although that’s admittedly far more common on Wikipedia, since many Wiktionary contributors are actually linguists and are less controversial).

            That being said, someone actually did intentionally move the “gang member” definition above the other one, so there’s clearly some sort of difference in opinion.

            If you want it changed, the course of action you should take is starting a discussion about it. It’s a good way to get a community consensus.

              • force@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                8 months ago

                No, not at all. You can easily view the edit history of all Wiktionary pages – 2 years ago, someone put the definitions in the order they are now for a specific reason. This person thinks it should be the other way around, so if they want to change it it’d be best to make a discussion about it. That’s the best way to get a community consensus on it. Wiktionary is a collaborative effort, people have different opinions on the specifics of a page, that’s why discussions exist and are the go-to for settling differences in views.

      • john89@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        It’s really sad watching you people make light of a serious topic.

        I guess it’s because you can’t tolerate any criticism of cities, even if they house most of the people who own guns illegally and use them on other humans.

        But it’s not front-page news on these websites whenever someone dies due to gang violence, because it happens every day.

        • VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          Yeah same thing comes up whenever high density housing is mentioned, you’re not allowed to mention how horrible it is because everyone is locked into an ideology where poor people belong in very small compressed areas because then we’ll be forced to ride bikes which is going to magically solve everything

    • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It also depends where. Suburban or exurban driveways in the South can be deadly with all the 2nd amendment hardliners. Especially in small or midsize cities. In northern or western urban or suburban areas, not as bad.