• jago@lemmy.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Fair rebuttal; we’re meant to infer the left-side hand pointing at the watch belongs to the same model of the right-side arm that’s wearing the watch. Admittedly, this is an assumption based on insufficient data. It’s not impossible that the finger-pointing left hand and the watch-wearing right wrist are owned by two different models.

        That doesn’t change the fact that the watch is worn on a right-arm wrist in an orientation that would show it as upside down to a right-arm wrist owner.

  • khannie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Awww. I had one of these as a kid. I thought it was the coolest thing ever at the time.

  • henfredemars@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    And to think yesterday I added 1 trillion additional bytes of storage to my computer for the same purchasing power as that watch cost when it was new. What a time to be alive.

  • Maalus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    Playing Abiotic Factor, and I go “huh that’s a neat watch”. Three days later, an advert for a decades old, exact same watch on Lemmy lol

  • WamGams@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Wow, I don’t know if I have ever seen an uglier advertisement… And I lived through the 90s Sunny D campaign.