Two wrongs don’t make a right.
Two wrongs don’t make a right.
Sure buddy. I’ll be here laughing my ass off in the meantime till that happens. Might be a veeeery long time
History book as in which one, the “I don’t live in the US and nobody outside of it will be impacted because of a president that already was in office”?
Why wouldn’t I be sheltered from the consequences of that? Lmao
For me. The thing is that Trump winning the election isn’t a surprising development, it’s years of democrats not knowing what the hell they are doing and going with a “holier than thou” approach, dismissing anyone who doesn’t immediately vote the same way they do.
It’s funny that saying “what has happened was deplorable” is such a controversional statement here. You don’t realize when you have gone so far in one direction that you looped back into being fascist yourself.
It’ll be so freaking funny when he wins
Screw that ship. The worse part is the two hidden shops you see only after spending a certain, high amount of cash on the game. So “regular players” don’t see it and “whales” do
Yeah, it was made with torque in mind (like, it’s in the name lol). For smaller screws using an impact, you can expect to break the screw before you strip the torx on top. And by smaller I don’t mean tiny, more like M4, M5
Except there wasn’t a worm that ate his brain, and a comment below describes why. But why am I arguing, you aren’t here to change your opinion if a medical condition is disqualifying one candidate, and not others.
Gotta clickbait somehow
A food safe silver spray has a bunch of “WITNESS MEEEE” type comments, along with people saying they tried it and it tastes awful and should be used on food, not your teeth
I’m not american so you wasted it anyways
Torx doesn’t get fucked though, compared to alan or philips
Way to gatekeep gun ownership. Everyone needs to choose guns based on your criteria, let’s ban everything else, huh?
If there is an equivalent gun with identical performance, then banning a gun because it is “assault” (which is an idiotic term anyway) is plain stupid. If you think those people you mention won’t do the same thing with a wooden stock, and all the problems of irresponsible gun owners go away, then I can’t really get through to you.
Imagine you own the “restricted” gun or a similar family of guns. Then they suddenly get banned and you need to get rid of your actually worthless guns, because nobody will buy them now. A collector could be down thousands.
You are saying “hot pink” like that’s not an insane approach to it. You are still doing the exact same thing that the people who want to ban guns are doing. You are mandating a change of form of how the firearm looks. How about not doing that and letting people own the guns they want to own, if they are using them for hunting, sport, etc? How about not banning the “scary” guns for their looks only?
And this exactly is the issue with gun bans. Just because something looks scary to you, or looks like it’s from a videogame doesn’t mean it’s more capable than other guns, or that it isn’t used for hunting.
Yeah it does. Because you will be killing “fascists” till your vision of the world appears and anyone in the way will be branded a fascist. Killing makes you a bad person, regardless of who you are killing. If you don’t realize that, then there is no saving you.