Misinformation campaigns increasingly target the cavity-fighting mineral, prompting communities to reverse mandates. Dentists are enraged. Parents are caught in the middle.

The culture wars have a new target: your teeth.

Communities across the U.S. are ending public water fluoridation programs, often spurred by groups that insist that people should decide whether they want the mineral — long proven to fight cavities — added to their water supplies.

The push to flush it from water systems seems to be increasingly fueled by pandemic-related mistrust of government oversteps and misleading claims, experts say, that fluoride is harmful.

The anti-fluoridation movement gained steam with Covid,” said Dr. Meg Lochary, a pediatric dentist in Union County, North Carolina. “We’ve seen an increase of people who either don’t want fluoride or are skeptical about it.”

There should be no question about the dental benefits of fluoride, Lochary and other experts say. Major public health groups, including the American Dental Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, support the use of fluoridated water. All cite studies that show it reduces tooth decay by 25%.

      • GiuseppeAndTheYeti
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        60
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        Every single scientific study regarding the use of fluoride in drinking water to help protect oral health. Link me a scientific study that proves flouride in drinking water is harmful.

          • GiuseppeAndTheYeti
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            38
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            You’re not going to argue sources because you don’t have any and your account is a 28 day old troll account.

            • john89@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              55
              ·
              7 months ago

              I’m not going to argue sources because it’s a waste of time.

              You’re just saying I’m a troll because you don’t want to acknowledge how you treat science like a religion.

              Goodbye.

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            21
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            try to understand that scientific consensus once said that it’s safe to put lead in gasoline, paint, and pipes.

            Please show this consensus.

              • snooggums
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                31
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                Ah yes, comparing lies from for profit companies to actual science done by medical providers is a very valid comparison.

                Wait, not it isn’t. The article shows how real science overcame blatant lying.

                You played yourself.

                • john89@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  33
                  ·
                  7 months ago

                  At the time, people couldn’t tell the difference.

                  That’s my point.

                  Do you just believe all scientific consensus as fact?

                  • NOT_RICK@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    23
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    It’s more useful to follow scientific consensus and update your reasoning in the presence of new evidence than it is to label something a contaminate while providing no data to support that position.